The more scientists know about global warming, the less able they are to predict the outcomesby Fred Pearce / November 17, 2010 / Leave a comment
Published in December 2010 issue of Prospect Magazine
Mexican standoff: climate talks in Cancun have been undermined by the global recession and a loss of confidence in scientists’ forecasts
Cancun in Mexico is one of the least environmentally friendly places on Earth—built out of sandy nothing to attract tourists. Yet it is here, from 29th November to 10th December, that governments will attempt to repair the damage from last year’s failed climate talks in Copenhagen.
In truth, hopes are not high for reaching agreement on a replacement for the Kyoto protocol. After the scale of Copenhagen, Cancun will be a downbeat affair. Heads of state will be largely absent. Even optimists only hope Cancun might be a stepping stone to a deal at the end of 2011.
Three things have gone wrong. First, the global recession has given politicians other priorities. Second, in international diplomacy, failure breeds failure. Having not delivered last year, few leaders want to invest political capital in another try. And finally, there is the cataclysm that has overtaken climate science in the meantime. “Climategate”—the release of damaging emails from the University of East Anglia’s (UEA) Climatic Research Unit—raised questions about the way climate scientists work; as did revelations about flaws in the 2007 assessment of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The most notorious was “glaciergate”: a claim that the Himalayan glaciers would melt away by 2035 was probably wrong by about three centuries.