Knowing that almost 200 women have had to provide proof of rape is bad enough. But the child benefit cap isn’t just cruel. It’s also woefully short-sightedby Dawn Foster / June 29, 2018 / Leave a comment
The Conservatives have claimed to be many things over the years: the party of business, the party of ‘British Values’—whatever that vague and woolly term means—but always the family of the traditional family.
The latter claim is in tatters, however, with the party’s increasingly anti-family policies wreaking havoc on the bank balances of most mid-to-low earning families. Under David Cameron and now Theresa May, it’s difficult to argue the party is anything more than a special interest group for plutocrats.
Nothing illustrates this more sharply than the Conservatives’ own two-child policy: child benefit, which was already a small drop in the pond of overall welfare spend, is now capped. Under the bungled Universal Credit scheme, the third and subsequent children in any family will be ineligible for any further child benefit.
The first figures released on the policy shift since it came into force in April 2017 show 71,000 families have already been affected. Once Universal Credit is fully rolled out, an additional 200,000 children will be plunged into poverty by the cap.
For each additional child after the first two, families stand to lose £2,720 whether they are in or out of work. Eventually, Child Poverty Action Group project 830,000 families with 2.5 million children will be affected—encompassing one in 6 children in the country.
There is an exception. Immediately upon announcement, many people noticed the government had provided those who had become pregnant through rape an opportunity to apply for an exemption, by submitt…