Her reputation for dithering is sexist. She knows what she wants—but she ain't tellingby Gaby Hinsliff / January 16, 2017 / Leave a comment
The joke is almost as old as the prime minister’s Westminster career, coined first in the late 1990s by fellow frontbenchers scornful of her seeming inability to give a straight answer to a straight question. Her behaviour then was read not just as timidity, but vacuity; proof, especially for male colleagues resentful of her unusually rapid rise to the shadow cabinet, that she was just another token woman promoted out of her depth.
Well, to some extent the joke is now on them. Yet the charge that she doesn’t know her own mind lingers. For months, Whitehall has grumbled under its breath about the difficulty of getting definitive green lights to launch even agreed domestic policies and more urgently about the lack of clear strategic direction from No. 10 over Brexit—concerns made brutally explicit in the recently leaked resignation email from Ivan Rogers, Britain’s departing ambassador to the European Union. In a withering new year profile of the woman it called “Theresa Maybe,” the Economist portrayed her as vacillating helplessly in a vacuum of ideas. Theresa May be moving inexorably towards a hard Brexit; then again, she may not. The same is true of her mission to help the “just about managing,” until more tangible policy details emerge.
As ever when a woman is accused of weakness for not following conventional alpha male leadership patterns, there is a grain of sexism here. Recent history is littered with the corpses of men who arrogantly assumed Theresa May would be a pushover, only to find out that she knows her own mind rather too well. (Not for nothing did Ken Clarke describe her as a “bloody difficult woman”; her favoured negotiating style is simply to grind her opponents down remorselessly.)
Besides, for all the gnomic statements about Brexit meaning Brexit, it is increasingly clear what sort of departure from the EU she wants—one prioritising lower immigration and freedom from the European Court of Justice over economic considerations such as single market membership, while then somehow salvaging the best trading terms compatible with that. It is merely unclear how she hopes to get it, or indeed how a formerly grudging Remainer could come round to such a hardline view.
Yet trying to understand May in ideological terms is part of the problem. The vicar’s daughter is essentially…