The Athenian electorate voted to kill all the men in Mytilene. Then they had a second vote and changed their mindsby Charlotte Higgins / October 18, 2018 / Leave a comment
Published in November 2018 issue of Prospect Magazine
Athenian democracy is often sentimentalised as the great ancestor of modern western democracies. But as usual when thinking about the ancient world, it’s really the points of difference with our own times that are interesting.
Radical Athenian democracy involved the entire eligible populace voting on intricate details of foreign policy, which is certainly not part of our system—or, at least, it never was until that “what have we done?” moment in June 2016. “Eligible” is also an important word here. Free, adult, citizen men took part in politics. Slaves, foreigners and women did not.
Another big twist is that many key posts were given out by lot. (Although, most of the really big roles, such as the generalships, tended to be appointments, and, surprise, surprise, frequently held by members of a handful of elite aristocratic families.)
Nevertheless, some of the arguments that raged about the merits and demerits of democracy in ancient Athens are still potent today. There may be few who are now willing to stick their necks out, Plato-style, and argue for putting philosopher-kings in charge. But running through Athenian thought from Herodotus to Thucydides is a recurrent anxiety: Are the people just rubbish at making decisions, incapable of proper deliberation? Are they instead liable to be swayed by spurious arguments and manipulated by power-hungry, unscrupulous rhetoricians?
Oh right, yes, that does ring a bell, doesn’t it?
“Kill all the men”
Here’s another thing that might remind you of the dilemmas produced by our own dabbling with direct democracy. In 427BC, during the Peloponnesian wars against Sparta, the Athenians…