In its worthy pursuit of what the philosopher Francis Bacon called “the relief of man’s estate,” science has a habit of creating previously unknown moral dilemmas. That’s nowhere more apparent than in the sciences pertaining to the beginning of human lives.
When IVF took off after the birth of Louise Brown in 1978, fertility doctors were faced with the question of what to do with embryos produced “in vitro”—that is, outside the womb—which would not, either because of their unviability or sheer excess in number, be implanted for gestation. Many were donated for embryological research, which has made huge strides as a result. But this has also complicated the already impassioned arguments—still unresolved—about the moral status of the human embryo.
Similar wrangles loom over the recent report in Nature by a team of scientists based in Israel who say that they can gestate mouse embryos in glass…
Register today to continue reading
You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.
You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.
Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.
Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.
Already a subscriber? Log in here