Latest Issue

Fresh air

There's an alternative plan to Kyoto, and the US would accept it, so why is no one paying attention?

By Alex Evans   May 2001

Amidst the panic and recrimination over President Bush’s decision to withdraw from the Kyoto Protocol, the startling fact is not that the US should have pulled out. It is that a credible alternative policy framework exists that can encompass the apparently incompatible demands made by the EU, US, developing world and others; and yet the media and the environment NGOs have been almost silent about it.

The concept, known on the international climate scene as “contraction and convergence” (C&C) was developed ten years ago by the Global Commons Institute, a tiny British organisation with virtually no resources that was set…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect