The big tabooby Rachel Sylvester / January 25, 2012 / Leave a comment
Published in February 2012 issue of Prospect Magazine
There are not meant to be taboos any more. From Tracey Emin’s unmade bed, to Lady Gaga’s meat dress, from Ricky Gervais’s use of the word “mong,” to Grayson Perry’s pink frocks, culture seems always to be breaking with convention. Shock matters more than chic. As deference has disappeared and the old elites have been overturned, freedom is worshipped in the Facebook age. Henry Miller’s assertion that “whenever a taboo is broken, something good happens,” rings loud and true.
Except, it seems, in politics. In Westminster taboos still carry enormous power. The armed forces, home ownership, and the Queen are off limits; the squeezed middle, banker-bashing and wishy-washy environmentalism are de rigueur.
Each party has its own taboos, of course. For New Labour, scarred by the 1992 shadow budget which was blamed for its general election defeat, it was always tax. For David Cameron’s Conservatives, desperate to shed the “nasty party” image, it was the NHS. “There are certain unbreakable taboos,” says a Tory cabinet minister. “It would be impossible for a Conservative who isn’t a Eurosceptic to win the leadership. Because political party membership has shrunk, parties are to a greater extent prisoners of their bases.”
And yet, across the spectrum, there is a remarkable consensus about what it is acceptable to challenge. Patrick Diamond, who worked at No 10 under Tony Blair, says the mandarins who remain in place when governments change are technocratic not revolutionary. “The options that are considered feasible and legitimate are very often framed by the civil service,” he says. “There’s an underlying conformity of thought which makes it very difficult for politicians to break out of those pathways with radical ideas.”