Not nearly enough women are entering the economics profession, owing to biases all the way through the systemby Vicky Pryce / October 10, 2018 / Leave a comment
Donna Strickland, an academic at the University of Waterloo in Canada, shared the recently-awarded Nobel Prize in physics. That brings the number of women awarded the physics prize since it started—Marie Curie was the first—to three. Much to celebrate there, even if progress is too slow. But only one woman, the late Elinor Ostrom—has ever won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.
Admittedly the Economics Prize was only established in 1968, and Ostrom had won numerous top academic prizes for her work before the Nobel. Nevertheless there are few signs that another woman will follow soon. It is widely-understood that women still face barriers in economics that men do not. But where precisely does the problem lie?
We know that it starts early: the field of women economists is too small to begin with. In the UK only 26 per cent of economics undergraduates are women. There are lots of reasons put forward for that. The mathematics requirement may be a barrier: in 2015 only some 18 per cent of girls taking A-levels did maths compared to 37 per cent of boys, for whom it is the most popular subject. In further maths the figures were 7 per cent for boys and just under 2 per cent for girls.
Looking at work done by various bodies, including the Institute of Education at UCL, the underlying perception that maths is a “masculine” subject is not shifting fast enough. Concerted effort is needed to change those perceptions—and at an early age if the inflow of girls into the economics profession is to increase.
On the positive side there are increasing signs that new emphasis on behavioural economics, whic…