Latest Issue

We should all be legal purists

Few things are more sinister than a government that does not take seriously its legal obligations

By George Peretz  

Frost deployed the term in a criticism of the EU. PA Images / Alamy Stock Photo

The phrase of the week in law and politics is “legal purism.” David Frost accused the European Commission of being “legal purists” when it came to the United Kingdom’s obligations under the Northern Ireland Protocol, and a viral tweet claimed (almost certainly inaccurately) that Michael Gove called the High Court “purist” in finding the award of a contract to a company run by friends of Dominic Cummings to be tainted by apparent bias and hence unlawful.

There is, however, nothing wrong with legal purism. The obligation of governments to comply with the law is fundamental in a democratic…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect