Latest Issue

Why the Coronavirus Act 2020 must be promptly and properly redrafted

The ambiguity over lockdown powers is alien to this country’s proud traditions

By B. Brandreth , G. Sandhurst  

Cyclists ride across an empty Westminster Bridge in front of the Houses of Parliament in Westminster, London, the day after Prime Minister Boris Johnson put the UK in lockdown to help curb the spread of the coronavirus.

An Englishman’s home is usually said to be his castle, not his prison. But the extraordinary times in which we live have called for and resulted in extraordinary measures. Under these we leave our homes at risk of fines or worse. We do indeed face a grave public health emergency and there is a need for drastic curtailments of our accustomed freedoms. But the legal route adopted to curtail the rights and liberties of the citizens of this country is profoundly unsatisfactory.

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect