Having transformed domestic politics, Tony Blair is now constructing a new idiom for Britain's place in the world in which liberal values can coexist with a proper patriotic prideby David Marquand / March 20, 2002 / Leave a comment
Published in March 2002 issue of Prospect Magazine
The real interest of James Naughtie’s recent book on the psychodynamics of Tony Blair’s relationship with his chancellor of the exchequer lies in what it fails to say. His book (The Rivals, Fourth Estate) purports to tell the story of a political marriage and, on one level, it does so. Naughtie is a close observer of the Westminster village. He knows and likes both his protagonists and writes about them with sympathy and insight. But his book sits all too comfortably in the idea-free zone which now encompasses most of British political journalism. He is fascinated by the emotional tug-of-war at the heart of the Blair-Brown relationship, the playground battles associated with it, and the feverish gossip they generate. We learn far more than any sensible person would wish to know about the courtiers who swarm around the two men. We watch Brownies and Blairites squaring up to each other like the Jenkinsites and Callaghanites of old. We trace the relentless extension of the Treasury’s tentacles into the uttermost reaches of Whitehall. We patrol the uneasy frontier between Blair’s sphere-the grand flashpoints of Northern Ireland, Kosovo, Europe and (anti-climactically) foot and mouth-and Brown’s domain as the grand vizier of domestic policy.
The complex manoeuvres which led to Brown’s decision not to stand against Blair when John Smith died are described in exhaustive detail. There is much learned speculation about the hint, or half-hint, or possibly half-promise which Blair is alleged to have made to Brown, to the effect that he might not stay on as prime minister for the whole of Labour’s second term, and about its impact on Brown’s psychology. Ideas, principles and beliefs scarcely get a look in. In effect, we are asked to believe that the differences between the two most remarkable Labour politicians of the last quarter century can be reduced to a mix of seething emotion and personal calculation.
What might we learn from a richer account? Almost by d…