Latest Issue

Good business has a bad crunch

This era's greatest episode of financial irresponsibility almost brought capitalism to its knees. But the corporate responsibility movement wasn't paying attention

By Daniel Litvin   November 2008

When historians come to write their account of the great financial crisis of 2008, what mention will be given to “Corporate Social Responsibility” (CSR)? Over the last decade, the world’s largest companies and governments have trumpeted CSR—action by companies to improve their impact on society—as a way to moderate capitalism’s excesses. CSR should now be centre stage. But it is not.

CSR—together with the related and equally fashionable concept of “socially-responsible investment” (SRI)—is promoted as a way to make business more ethical. Greater sensitivity to social and ethical concerns, the argument goes, should help companies reduce the risk of a…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect