• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Magazine

A self-selecting, card-carrying cadre could soon pick a PM—for the first time ever

As the May premiership moves from Brexit crisis to potential meltdown, it's time to pay attention to the unprecedented way in which her successor will be picked

by Tom Clark / October 6, 2017 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Andrea Leadsom: the PM we could have won. Photo: TOM NICHOLSON/LNP/REX/SHUTTERSTOCK

Boris Johnson’s pre-conference posturing over his “personal vision” for Brexit looked shambling to the country. He pre-empted the prime minister’s speech in Florence by setting his own criteria for the negotiations in a 4,000-word Telegraph essay, ran into resentment and appeared to back down—before resurfacing on the eve of the Tory get-together in Manchester muttering about red lines again. An understandably annoyed Theresa May declined to be drawn on his future, and Britain saw its foreign secretary exposed as a mopped-topped chancer.

There was, however, a parallel world in which Johnson had proved himself to be a No. 10-ready patriot—the world of Conservative activists. A YouGov survey of members found him edging a leadership run-off against David Davis, by 46 to 39 per cent, and trouncing the more liberal Amber Rudd 57-33. Such intra-party polls have proved accurate before, notably in spotting the rise of longshot Jeremy Corbyn among Labour’s rank and file. The bookies took note and, however daft Johnson looked to most voters, made him the new favourite to replace May.

There is no mystery about why the Conservative base might be out of kilter with the country. The members are self-selecting, ageing and strikingly thin on the ground. The Tory campaigner, John Strafford, recently told journalist David Hencke that membership was freefalling towards 100,000, down from one published figure of 150,000 in 2013. Where constituencies such as Churchill’s Woodford boasted membership of well over 10,000 in the 1950s, today, Strafford suggests, in 300 seats, membership is 100 or less.

A country with little taste for active involvement in Conservative politics is indifferent to the withering of the voluntary party—but one thing could soon change that. With May badly weakened by her misfiring election, and even more vulnerable after her faltering Manchester speech, the stage is set for the thinned ranks of members to pick the country’s next leader. Nothing remotely like that has ever happened before.

“Though rarer than ever, Conservative members will likely soon have more power than ever before”

Since the monarch finally lost all control over the pick in the early 19th century, every premier has either won an election in the country, or else emerged as, in effect, the choice of the MPs who represent it. When a PM goes, then, formally speaking, the Palace summons a replacement; but in practice and in sacrosanct convention, it calls on whoever is best-placed to command a Commons majority. In the distant past, this it established through rather mysterious consultation with the “men in grey suits” deemed to know the backbench mood. But in the 1960s, the Tories copied Labour and moved to a formal ballot of MPs. For a generation, that was the mechanism: James Callaghan replaced Harold Wilson through one such ballot in 1976; through another, in 1990, John Major took over from Margaret Thatcher.

Labour first gave members some say over the leadership in 1981; the Tories followed suit the best part of two decades later under William Hague. But neither party has ever used their internal democracy to fill No. 10. The last two mid-term changes in government, rather than opposition, were accomplished by parliamentarians closing ranks. By 2007, Gordon Brown had made himself seem so inevitable as Tony Blair’s heir, that nine Labour MPs in 10 nominated him, leaving nobody else with the numbers to run. In 2016, May watched and waited as a gamut of wannabes imploded—including Johnson, Michael Gove and finally the obscure Andrea Leadsom, who eventually folded after personally slighting May for not having children. May was then, in effect, crowned by acclamation. Mainstream MPs breathed an almighty sigh of relief, because some had feared that, in the heady wake of the referendum, the members could have been tempted by Leadsom, the wildly unready Brexit hardliner, over the Remain-voting May.

That will remain a “what if?” but, in opposition, members have often shown that they can’t be relied on to follow MPs: Ken Clarke was running ahead of Iain Duncan Smith among parliamentarians in 2001, but in the final party ballot he went down by over 20 points. And on the Labour side, Corbyn has more recently notched up overwhelming majorities of around 60 per cent, despite being mistrusted by 90 per cent of his MPs.

Tory MPs do, it is true, still get to whittle down candidates to the final two, just as Labour MPs still provide nominations. If, for example, the MPs tire of Johnson’s naked ambition, they might head him off at the pass. But hopelessly divided on Brexit, they will struggle to co-ordinate much.

Though rarer than ever, Conservative members will likely soon have more power than ever before. What they will use it for is less certain. Activists don’t always lurch to the extremes—in 2005, two Tory members in three went for the modernising smoothie, David Cameron; in 1988, just seven years after internal democracy was supposed to cement the Left’s grip on Labour, its electoral college rejected Tony Benn’s run against Neil Kinnock by 89 to 11. And on occasion, as Corbyn supporters can argue after June’s close election, members might be ahead of MPs in reading the country.

But when members are as few as in today’s Tory Party, nothing can be assumed about the result—or the country’s reaction to it. Entrusting the choice of PM to a card-carrying cadre is an experiment we’ve not run before. It won’t be long—I suspect—before we know how it goes down. I, for one, will be listening out for a clamour for an early election. 

Go to comments

Related articles

Heidi Allen: “I probably would” join a new centrist party
Alex Dean / November 21, 2018
The Conservative MP on political realignment and why she won’t vote for May’s deal
Can Ruth Davidson save the Tories?
Dani Garavelli / August 21, 2018
She has a reputation for being a different kind of Conservative—but just how far can...
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

No comments yet

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Prospect is the leading magazine of ideas. Each month it is packed with the finest writing on politics, culture, economics and ideas. Subscribe today and join the debate.

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

The invigorating strangeness of Friedrich Nietzsche

The naïve optimism of Liam Fox

The Duel: Has modern architecture ruined Britain?

What the row over Winston Churchill's legacy is really about

This proposal for breaking the Brexit deadlock deserves serious consideration

Ruling out no deal is the wrong sort of red line

6 Comments

The Conservative Party has a problem—it’s no longer conservative

5 Comments

The overlooked dynamic at the heart of the Brexit “culture war”

2 Comments

Arlene Foster’s DUP still holds the balance of power in Westminster—so what’s their next move?

2 Comments

The impact of Brexit on services has not received nearly enough attention

2 Comments

About this author

Tom Clark
Tom Clark is Editor of Prospect
  • Follow Tom on:
  • Twitter
More by this author

More by Tom Clark

Barry Gardiner: those who expect Brexit cliff edge to trigger election are in “looney tunes territory”
September 24, 2018
Prospect editorial: the outrage factory
September 21, 2018
Case study: polite politics versus Twitter twaddle
September 20, 2018

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Diarmaid MacCulloch

    London, 2019-05-20

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Sue Prideaux

    2019-04-15

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Andrew Roberts

    2019-03-14

See more events

Sponsored features

  • Reforming the pension system to work for the many

  • Putting savers in the driving seat: getting the pensions dashboard right

  • To fix the housing crisis we need fresh thinking

  • Tata Steel UK: Driving innovation for the future of mobility

  • The road to zero

PrimeTime

The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Steve Bloomfield
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Stephanie Boland
Deputy Digital Editor (Political Correspondent): Alex Dean
Creative Director: Mike Turner
Production Editor & Designer: Chris Tilbury
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulations Executive: James Hawkins
Programme Coordinator: Oliver James Ward
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Senior Account Manager: Dominic Slonecki 0203 372 2972

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days..
PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.