Grayling’s answer 10th July 2007
I am sorry that AC Grayling regards philosophical criticism as a personal attack, to which he feels entitled to respond in kind.
The issue between us is not personal but philosophical. My question stands: what are we to make of Grayling’s philosophy when it claims for itself a monopoly of truth, and when he treats the thinking of others (including most philosophers) with scorn and contempt?
I conclude this correspondence with some advice to Grayling, from Spinoza: “The wisdom of others comes alive when it is regarded neither with derision nor with lamentation…
Register today to continue reading
You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.
You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.
Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.
Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.
Already a subscriber? Log in here