The word “inauguration” entered English in the early 17th century from the Latin, inaugurare. This literally meant “the taking of auguries,” but had come to signify an official beginning because, in Roman times, any major undertaking was preceded by the consultation of augurs: priests who minutely examined the flight of birds to work out what the gods thought.
It’s rather the other way round now. A new president speaks, and the world probes his every tic for portents—witness the wild claim that Obama’s mangling of his oath means he is not, technically, president. Still, inaugural addresses are mass verbal events…
Register today to continue reading
You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.
You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.
Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.
Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.
Already a subscriber? Log in here