Latest Issue

Against unhappiness

Paul Ormerod is splitting hairs over methodology. People want to be happy, and politicians should try to help

By Richard Layard   June 2007

I welcome Paul Ormerod’s contribution to the happiness debate (Prospect, April 2007) but I disagree with most of what he says. He argues that government should not concern itself with happiness, since this would only lead to excessive government and ill-informed intervention.

But what should the government be seeking to promote, if not happiness? When goals like liberty, equality and prosperity conflict, by what criterion should we chart our course other than the happiness of our citizens? Ormerod offers no alternative. He just wants the government to keep out of happiness and avoid the dangers of information failure, even if…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect