Latest Issue

Freud or faux

The popular appeal of Freud's ideas has never been greater, but their scientific value has recently been under sustained attack. The philosopher AC Grayling discusses both the reasons for this renewed scepticism and Freud's lasting appeal

By AC Grayling   March 1997

Ludwig Wittgenstein wrote that just when he was coming to the conclusion that psychology is nonsense, he read Freud and underwent a revelation. Thereafter he called himself Freud’s disciple and described him as “one of the few authors worth reading.” At the same time he was severely critical of psychoanalysis, calling it “fanciful pseudo-explanation.” He warned a friend who was studying Freud’s theories, “psychoanalysis is a dangerous and foul practice, it has done no end of harm and comparatively little good.”

Wittgenstein’s ambivalence is easily explained. He admired Freud the artist, but found his theories confused and misleading. In so…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect