Latest Issue

The duel: Should we give up on meritocracy?

A rigged system or driver of social progress? Our contributors battle it out

Image: Myriam Borzee / Alamy Stock Photo

Yes—Daniel Markovits

One of meritocracy’s great attractions is that it beats the familiar alternatives. Surely it is better for people to get ahead based on their accomplishments than, say, race or social class. Another attraction is that “merit” itself remains pleasantly vague. Accomplishments are not easy to measure.

Eventually, an actual meritocracy must fill in the picture. We measure merit first by exam and then market competition. In each case we worship superiority. We rank students and workers, asking not who has done well but who is best. This reality undermines the abstract appeal.

First, marks…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect