The strangest art

A superb new history of opera argues that revivals of classic works are keeping the genre from flourishing today. Not so

by Wendy Lesser / December 27, 2012 / Leave a comment
Published in January 2013 issue of Prospect Magazine

A caricature by Gustave Doré from the 1860s: “People who sing opera generate huge acoustic forces”

A History of Opera: The Last 400 Years
by Carolyn Abbate and Roger Parker (Allen Lane, £30)

Opera must be one of the weirdest forms of entertainment on the planet. Its exaggerated characters bear little relation to living people, and its plots are often ludicrous. Yet it demands from its audiences real involvement, real sympathy, even real tears. Mothers constantly fail to recognise their sons, sisters their brothers, husbands their wives, but we, sitting at a distance of hundreds of metres, are expected to penetrate all the thin disguises. Women dress as men posing as women—mainly in order to make love to other women—and nobody turns a hair. And on top of all this, people sing all their lines: not in the way you or I might sing, in a lullaby-ish, folk song-ish mode, but inhumanly, extremely, with a visible awareness of their own remarkable achievement.

It is great to see that you are enjoying the Prospect website.

You have now reached your allowance of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
Don’t worry—to get another 7 articles absolutely free, just enter your email address in the box below.

You are in complete control of which 7 articles you choose to read. Register now to enjoy more of the finest writing on politics, economics, literature, the arts, philosophy and science.

When you register, we’ll also send you our free Uncertain Times e-book which analyses the big ideas changing our world AND we’ll send you our free weekly newsletter. (If you prefer not to receive the newsletter you can unsubscribe at any time).

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.
You can unsubscribe from the Prospect e-mail newsletter at any time.

DEBUG messsage: regular

Return of the Roman

Allan Massie / November 19, 2006

Knowledge of Latin may be in decline, but novels, films and documentaries about the...

Songs of life, death, love and the landscape

Ian Bostridge: born to sing Lieder

Sameer Rahim / January 15, 2015

The singer has been performing his greatest obsession for more than 30 years

Share with friends

Comments

Rochelle
December 14, 2012 at 02:15
The most important point of opera is the music. We're willing to put up with the absurdity of the plot because opera is about the glorious music, which can transcend the absurd plot or outdated staging.
Reply
John Borstlap
December 14, 2012 at 17:28
The objection that opera is so far removed from human reality, rests upon a misunderstanding. Like all art, opera is a stylization of reality, a re-interpretation, a mental space created with the intention to present real life experience in concentrated and aestheticized form. What we see on stage is the outer reality of a situation, what we hear is its inner reality, as experienced by the protagonists and shared with the audience through the music. With good opera, the music gives us entry into the inside of characters and plot, and it is THIS which is the exciting thing of the art form. Let's not forget that in real life, we have only exteriors to navigate upon; only our own inner life is - more or less - known to us. With opera, the barriers of physical reality are down and we experience the essence of life. And then it appears that there, extremism and absurdity reigns, which is just what full reality is about. That there are not many new operas which can stand comparison with the existing repertoire, is simply due to the development of modernism in music, which rejected notions of expression and continuity, without which no real opera can be composed. A purely materialistic sound language - 'sonic art ' - cannot function as operatic music, because it cannot share the inside of what happens on the stage. That is why 'new opera' is so often boring, merely a play with some illustrative sounds underneath. And the Glass things are boring as well, because that kind of music (appropriately called 'minimal music') produces a glassy sound wall between stage and audience. It may be entertaining but it is not an idiom suited to opera. New classical music like Nicolas Bacri's (France's new great talent, convert from modernism) offers better opportunities in the future.... or new generations of ocmposers who have no interest in modernism.
Reply
Matt Patton
December 15, 2012 at 18:54
This makes me think of Robert Benchley's great parody of opera scenarios written some 80 or 90 years ago, particularly The Ring Cycle, which, having put the characters through complications only SLIGHTLY more absurd than what Wagner did, ends by noting "Immgergluck never marries . . ."
Reply
Norman
December 20, 2012 at 06:40
If you want to witness the horrible state of 'modern' opera and be horified at what discerning audiences can choke down try Thomas Adès’s The Temptest that the Met is putting forth. The singers sound like they are doing scales preparing for a real opera and the libretto is on a par with high schoolers practicing poetry. A friend who is an opera lover said she loved it but it wasn't Puccini. Bet your sweet ass it wasn't Puccini.
Reply

You can log in to post a comment under your subscriber name.