Despite the fact that some Labour MPs plan to defy itby Tom Quinn / January 27, 2017 / Leave a comment
One of the great ironies of Brexit is that while the European question deeply divided the Conservatives for a generation, it is Labour that is now facing the toughest questions. This has been brought into sharp relief in recent days, particularly with the resignation of Labour MP Tulip Siddiq from the front-bench.
The UK’s vote to leave the EU has put Labour in a quandary. Most leading Labour figures campaigned for “Remain,” reflecting their support for integration in general and the EU’s social dimension in particular. Voting for the government’s bill to trigger Article 50, which will start the withdrawal process, will be a wrench. Yet there was a clear (if narrow) majority for leaving on a high turnout in last year’s referendum. If Labour were to position itself in opposition to majority opinion in the country, it could find itself under attack for ignoring the wishes of the people.
If Labour voters had been solidly for remaining in the EU, then the party’s predicament wouldn’t be so acute. However, 35 per cent ignored their party’s advice and voted “Leave.” Even worse, two-thirds of Labour-held parliamentary constituencies are estimated to have voted to “Leave.” The European issue has highlighted a fissure within Labour’s electoral coalition: many working-class voters in towns in the north and midlands, motivated by a desire to control immigration, voted to leave; but more middle-class Labour supporters and those from ethnic minorities, concentrated in metropolitan areas, especially London, were more likely to vote to “Remain.”