• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Opinions

Literary fight clubs

We may not like to admit it, but literary fights and feuds are much more entertaining than friendships

by Elaine Showalter / November 13, 2014 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Published in December 2014 issue of Prospect Magazine
Wordsworth and Coleridge: literary frenemies

Wordsworth and Coleridge: literary frenemies

Literary Rivals by Richard Bradford (Robson Press, £14.99)

When I first began to study literary history at university, I was struck by the friendship between Samuel Taylor Coleridge and William Wordsworth. How was it that so many great British writers met their literary doubles and nemeses early in their careers? Which came first, the chicken of genius or the egg of empathy? Were Wordsworth and Coleridge magnetically drawn together because they were both great poets, or did they become great poets because they were drawn together? And why were these writers always male?

Richard Bradford begins his musings on literary rivalry with the friendship of Wordsworth and Coleridge. When they met in 1795, they were mutually enamoured as poets and radicals. “Wordsworth is a very great man,” wrote Coleridge, “the only man to whom at all times and in all modes of excellence I feel myself inferior.” Wordsworth found the mystical, adventurous, experimental Coleridge “the most wonderful man I ever knew.” Within six weeks, Coleridge had moved to Grasmere to be close to his new friend. While Wordsworth was inspired by Coleridge’s fireworks, Coleridge was steadied by his friend’s disciplined ambition. Their historic collaboration on the Lyrical Ballads (1798) kicked off the Romantic movement.

But the very qualities that attracted them to each other soon began to drive them apart. By 1809, Wordsworth was fed up with Coleridge’s procrastination, dithering and addictions, confiding to a mutual friend that “neither his talents or his genius mighty as they are, nor his vast information will avail him anything: they are all frustrated by a derangement of intellectual and moral constitution.” They never had an open confrontation, but met less and less, although it took another 20 years for Coleridge to admit his disillusionment with Wordsworth’s growing conservatism and dull domesticity. “I was repelled by the infinite number of dissonances which his way of thinking, feeling and arguing created with my own,” Coleridge wrote. “Recently all the shortcomings, each marked him in his early manic manly years, have increased considerably; the grand flourishings of his philosophic and poetic genius, have withered and dried.”

YOU'VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
But don't worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we'll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we'll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.
You can unsubscribe from the Prospect e-mail newsletter at any time.

DEBUG messsage: regular

Related articles

The media should stop treating Kim Wall's death as a "Scandi noir" story
Jane Merrick / August 24, 2017
Media outlets have repeatedly compared her disappearance to Scandi crime drama. But Wall...
Men's mental health is at risk—could reading more fiction help?
Sarah Manavis / August 30, 2017
As charities warn of a crisis in men's health, building empathy among men of all ages is...
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

  1. Steve Sailer
    November 14, 2014 at 11:04
    Or Lennon & McCartney.British rock music history seems more comprised of squabbling friends than American rock history.
  2. Adrian Michael Kelly
    November 14, 2014 at 12:44
    A scholar as meticulous as Dr. Showalter would appreciate, I hope, this minor correction: John Updike's Rabbit novels are about Rabbit Angstrom, not Bech, who has his own series, as it were.
  3. Serge
    November 19, 2014 at 14:41
    The feuds and antagonisms are not entertaining or "delightful"; they are simply rude, and lower the esteem due to the individuals involved. If they cannot treat others with respect, then they deserve less respect themselves.
  4. Evelyn T
    November 21, 2014 at 13:55
    To use Adrian Michael Kelly's gracious formulation, "A scholar as meticulous as Dr. Showalter would appreciate, I hope," being corrected on the subject of Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Grasmere: Coleridge did not move to Grasmere to be near Wordsworth six weeks after the two met; in fact, Wordsworth only moved there four years after meeting Coleridge, who never lived there at all (though he did pay long and sometimes disastrous visits to the Wordsworth family at Dove Cottage). The two poets met in Somerset, and it was there that Wordsworth moved, in order to be near Coleridge, two years, not six months, after that first meeting. And Wordsworth called Coleridge (though only after his death) not "the most wonderful man I ever knew" but "the only wonderful man I ever knew." Ahem. Other reviewers have complained of Bradford's errors; I can only assume that these, too, are Bradford's.

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Should we be worried about tech giants? In this month's issue, John Naughton explains how they've created a new surveillance capitalism. Plus: Samira Shackle on collective punishment after Islamic State, Shahidha Bari on monstrous men and Salman Rushdie answers our questions.

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

The new surveillance capitalism

What does Momentum really want?

If David Cameron had asked the right question on Brexit, Remain could have won

EU Withdrawal Bill: So it falls to the Lords to protect our fundamental rights

The Brexit struggle awaiting Theresa May in 2018

5 Comments

Diane James: Nigel Farage is wrong to consider a second EU referendum

3 Comments

The great globalisation lie

3 Comments

Remainers need to start telling a better story

3 Comments

The new surveillance capitalism

2 Comments

About this author

Elaine Showalter
Elaine Showalter is a literary critic and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature. She won the Truman Capote Award for Literary Criticism in 2012 for her book, A Jury of Her Peers: American Women Writers from Anne Bradstreet to Annie Proulx
  • Follow Elaine on:
  • Twitter
More by this author

More by Elaine Showalter

Jonathan Safran Foer’s new novel doesn't lack chutzpah
August 18, 2016
A cryogenics cult: Don DeLillo's "Zero K"
March 24, 2016
Jonathan Franzen: a man with talent to burn
July 16, 2015

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Fergal Keane

    London, 2018-04-16

  • Details

    One year to go—Is Britain ready for Brexit?

    London, 2018-03-29

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Pankaj Mishra

    London, 2018-03-19

See more events

Sponsored features

  • Today’s manufacturing workforce challenge

  • Britain's transport infrastructure: A new vision

  • Brexit Britain: the future of industry

  • Opportunity and need for a new phase of development policy towards the occupied Palestinian territory

  • Beyond the bank

PrimeTime

Prospect was originally founded by Editor David Goodhart and Publisher Derek Coombs, as a home for intelligent debate. The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities. The aim is to tackle the big challenges confronting society, through rigorous thinking and fine writing.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Steve Bloomfield
Executive Editor: Jay Elwes
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Stephanie Boland
Deputy Digital Editor: Alex Dean
Design: Mike Turner
Production Editor: Chris Tilbury
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Finance Manager: Pauline Joy
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulations Executive: James Hawkins
Head of Research and Engagement: Saskia Perriard-Abdoh
Events Assistant: Megan Randles
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Senior Account Manager: Richard Rowe 020 3372 2972
Senior Account Manager: Sophie Ryan 020 3372 2927
Account Manager: Scott Smith 020 3372 2931

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’swebsite for FREE in the next 30 days..
PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.
You can unsubscribe from the Prospect e-mail newsletter at any time.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.