Public intellectuals and the financial crisis

Prospect Magazine

Public intellectuals and the financial crisis


Who has contributed best to the “public conversation” during these turbulent times? Prospect names the top 25 brains of the financial crisis

A worthy winner: Simon Johnson, Professor at MIT, Peterson Institute fellow and former IMF chief economist

The financial crisis has destroyed both wealth and received wisdom. The idea that prices are always right and markets self-correct is fatally challenged. Even Alan Greenspan admits that the “whole intellectual edifice” of the efficient market hypothesis collapsed in the summer of 2008. The financial establishment is in a state of deep confusion. As the FT’s Gillian Tett put it in September’s Prospect: it is like “a priest who has lost faith in the Bible, but still has to go to church.” But this is not a bad thing, for it has opened up new ways of thinking about markets, institutions and the all-important cause of financial reform.

Unfamiliar voices have come to prominence, aided by a new wave of financial bloggers eager to push fresh ideas. But who has made the most impact? Prospect assembled a panel of experts to draw up a list of leading “public intellectuals” of the financial crisis in 2009 and then decide on the most important. Our criteria were simple. Anyone who had made an impact on policy with their ideas, or who had changed the “public conversation” was a candidate.

The panel sifted hundreds of names, with an unavoidable bias towards Britain and the US, but felt the most important contributions had been in financial reform—those trying to work out what to do next. The crisis has laid a staggering financial burden on the world, with some $14 trillion propping up US and EU banks. We cannot afford another one. Moreover, we urgently need a new regulatory philosophy. Are liquid markets always good? Is complexity in financial services harmful? Can finance firms stop “herding,” creating wild booms and busts?

The role of the banks themselves is also being rethought. They have mushroomed in size without doing a better job—Royal Bank of Scotland’s balance sheet grew 20-fold in the decade from 1998. Some banks have become too big to fail and hence dangerous. Should we return to the strict division between commercial and investment banking, as proposed by Paul Volcker and Mervyn King? And how can we now rein in this super-sized financial system with its powerful lobby? Many of the surviving megabanks have pressured governments for a return to the status quo ante. They want their old economy back, with the implicit warning that if they don’t get it there will be no recovery—and politicians will be blamed.

We considered all of this, and gradually whittled the names down to a shortlist of just 25 (see facing page), and then a top three. In reverse order, the bronze medal went to Adair Turner, chairman of Britain’s Financial Services Authority, who bravely questioned the social usefulness of some financial activity, and called for regulators to force banks to hold more capital against risky trades, cutting their profitability. Next, silver went to Avinash Persaud, a respected analyst who spotted nine years ago the dangerous interaction between firms “herding” and new risk management techniques. During 2009 he has been arguing for new “macro-prudential” regulation to stop what he discovered a decade ago.

But there was a clear winner. He is Simon Johnson, an economist at the prestigious Peterson Institute in Washington, DC, who has been leading the argument against overmighty banking. His ideas are well grounded in theory, but he has also done more than any academic to popularise his case: writing articles, a must-read blog, and appearing tirelessly on television. As the FT’s Martin Wolf told Prospect: “Johnson’s significance is that he is a member of the establishment—a former IMF chief economist, no less—who has emphasised the capture of the state by big finance, for the latter’s own ends. An expert on crises in emerging countries and in transition from communism, he has called what he has seen: crony capitalism at the heart of the financial system.” In particular Johnson’s essay “The Quiet Coup,” in the Atlantic of May 2009, is one of the great polemical essays of the crisis. Far from skulking in an ivory tower, he has urged citizens to the streets.

We need an informed debate about making finance safer. Johnson, Persaud and Turner led that debate in 2009.


1. Simon Johnson Professor at MIT, Peterson Institute fellow, former IMF chief economist, blogger, troublemaker and scourge of once-mighty banks—a worthy winner in 2009.

2. Avinash Persaud Financial liquidity analyst, adviser to governments around the world, the man who has studied “herd” behaviour in finance, and now the man trying to stop it.

3. Adair turnerAn unusually bold regulator, Turner made headlines worldwide slamming “socially useless” finance (in Prospect) and suggesting a Tobin tax to put sand in the wheels of global finance.

Ben Bernanke Cerebral Federal Reserve chairman, seen by many as saviour of the US economy while congress dithered.

Andrew Haldane Bank of England director who warned of a “doom loop” of perpetual banking bailouts.

Philip Hildebrand Swiss banker who boldly pushed cutting his country’s banks to size.

John Kay Well-regarded British economist who wants a return to simple banking.

Mervyn King Bank of England boss, initially wrong-footed by the crisis, but had a better, more aggressive 2009.

Richard Koo Insider adviser to politicians and banks, an expert on the lessons from Japan, and deficit dove-in-chief.

Paul Krugman Celebrated economist and author of a must-read New York Times essay on the failures of economics.

Christine Lagarde French minister of economic affairs who got just the right mix of stick and carrot for French banks.
donald mackenzie Edinburgh professor, author of many sharp LRB essays unpicking the anthropology of finance.

Lucy Prebble 28-year-old British author of Enron, the best play yet on irrational exuberance.

Nouriel Roubini Legendarily gloomy, normally correct finance analyst whose blogs alone can move markets.

Brad Setser Young policy wonk, co-blogger with Simon Johnson and author of Bailouts or Bail-ins? with Roubini.

Robert Shiller Credit-crunch US sage and behavioural economics pioneer.

Jon Stewart Brainy American satirist whose Daily Show has made finance a laughing stock.

Joseph Stiglitz Nobel laureate, chair of UN commission on financial reform and harsh critic of finance-as-usual.

Matt Taibbi US journalist, wrote a celebrated scathing attack on Goldman Sachs.

Paul Volcker Ex-Fed chair, pushing for splitting up investment and savings banks.

Elizabeth Warren Harvard professor, consumer rights watchdog, leads the panel watching over Obama’s bailout money.

Martin Wolf FT writer and the Anglosphere’s most influential finance journalist.

Paul Woolley Innovative LSE thinker on “capital market dysfunctionality.”

Yu Yongding Influential economist at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

Zhou Xiaochuan Bank of China head, architect of China’s response to the crisis.

Thanks to those who helped us pick a list or select winners, including: Rudi Bogni, Diane Coyle, Will Davies, Meghnad Desai, John Eatwell, Christopher Hird, Will Hutton, Faisal Islam, Stephanie Flanders, George Magnus, Jasper McMahon, Felix Salmon, Richard Sennett, Rohan Silva, Laura Tyson, Isabel Hilton and Graham Turne

  1. December 17, 2009

    Cincinattus Jr.

    I can only assume you are being facetious in naming Jon Stewart to your list of “intellectuals,” although I suppose in the context of the others named, such a person could be seen as serious given the liberal penchant for shallowness of thought as long as it is sufficiently emotive.

  2. December 17, 2009

    Ted Ditchburn

    The main thrust of the Quiet Coup is the reason I feel the debate about how best to dampen the bonus culture and it’s perceived tendency to encourage short term thinking over longer term planning (Like planning on keeping a coherent society in place next year).

    It is why I feel we shouldn’t be using fiscal or taxation measures to do this but instead use the criminal justice system.

    The main levers to behavioural change, would be the widespread sight of major Finance industry figures cuffed up amidst uniformed police officers on their way to long spells on remand in prison —and completely random selection of the people to be investigated.

    Trials need not be expensive because they need never take place—

    In this way the punishment meted by society would be arbitrary, cruel, disproportionate and violate ‘natural justice’ (whatever that means these days)—and so match precisely the effects caused by the actions of these people in the wider society.

    After a few such episodes ‘they’ might even begin to finally ‘get it’….

    (I am joking…at least I think I am)

  3. December 17, 2009


    Curious omissions:

    – Nassim Nicholas Taleb (author of the Black Swan)

    – Niall Ferguson (‘Chimerica’ theory proponent)

    – William Buiter (Economist and FT columnist)

  4. December 18, 2009


    Paul Krugman

    …wait you’re being serious?

  5. December 18, 2009


    Peter Schiff?

  6. December 18, 2009

    Get Real

    your list is a joke. tiabbi? stewart? bernanke? none of them saw the crisis coming. none of them saw the crisis after it was in full swing. one of them had a part in causing the meltdown.

    get real and stop insulting your readers.

  7. December 18, 2009


    Funny how you include Krugman, a guy who advocated the housing bubble (before it burst and nearly destroyed us)… you include Bernanke, who bears a large part of the blame for the meltdown… yet you omit Peter Schiff, the man who told all of us the crisis was coming. Was failure a prerequisite for inclusion?

  8. December 18, 2009


    Yes, Taleb and Buiter, but Ferguson is a broken record. Note to youngsters: phonograph records were a primitive audio medium. Before vinyl was used, they would develop cracks that would cause the tone arm to repeat a couple of revolutions (a second or two) endlessly. Tone arms were analogous to hard drive disk heads.

  9. December 18, 2009


    Also: Mark Thoma (Economist’s View) and the mysterious Yves Smith (Naked Capitalism).

  10. December 19, 2009


    Because some the names I know on the list are a joke, I’m not sure about the ones I don’t know and I don’t intend to risk wasting time on researching them. Did it really take 18 people to come up with the list?

  11. December 19, 2009


    Hmmm. I would have thought the biggest lesson we learned from the financial collapse was how silly it was for us to believe anything but a free market could set interest rates.

    Especially since governed bodies insist on giving us The Basil Accords and the Community Investment Act.

    But you’re saying it was the markets who reacted to them that failed. Interesting.

  12. December 30, 2009


    Mouuuuaaaaahaaah, Christine Lagarde at n°11 of the 25 \top brains\ of the crisis! As a French person, I consider that assertion as the n° 1 of the 10 \top jokes\ of the crisis. \Right mix of stick and carrot\???? Which stick? There has been nothing more than several brunches with a pat on the hand \now now, we’re going to lend money to the households and the SMEs aren’t we?\ Can we please stop considering that in politics, saying equals doing? For all their so-called left-wingish big talks (which only fools the far right wing, which is now accusing Sarkozy of being close to a communist, n° 2 top joke), Lagarde who, like all our so-called government, is nothing but her master’s voice, does absolutely nothing which might even remotely risk to annoy the interests of big money, be it banks, press tycoons or big industrialists (in other words family and friends of our Beloved King).

  13. September 15, 2010

    Financial advisor

    We considered all of this, and gradually whittled the names down to a shortlist of just 25 (see facing page), and then a top three. In reverse order, the bronze medal went to Adair Turner, chairman of Britain’s Financial Services Authority

  14. September 23, 2010

    Tanning Beds

    Wow, I was following right along with the list until I hit Jon Stewart’s name and then it lost all credibility with me. Really, Jon Stewart in the list with all of these other great minds?

  15. November 21, 2010

    Financial Crisis

    Economics is a tough enough scientific problem but after it collides with political slants driven by subconscious assumptions and preferences don’t expect much. What kinda amazes me is the way we assume that casual commentators, shooting from the hip, could possibly come to grips with anything like “the economy”. DIY brain surgery is more likely to work, isn’t it?

  16. December 7, 2011

    Best Office Chair

    Was failure a prerequisite for inclusion?none of them saw the crisis coming. none of them saw the crisis after it was in full swing. one of them had a part in causing the meltdown.

Leave a comment


Jonathan Ford

Jonathan Ford is chief leader writer at the FT 

Share this

Most Read

Prospect Buzz

  • Prospect's masterful crossword setter Didymus gets a shout-out in the Guardian
  • The Telegraph reports on Nigel Farage's article on Lords reform
  • Prospect writer Mark Kitto is profiled in the New York Times

Prospect Reads

  • Do China’s youth care about politics? asks Alec Ash
  • Joanna Biggs on Facebook and feminism
  • Boris Berezosky was a brilliant man, says Keith Gessen—but he nearly destroyed Russia