• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Magazine

Duel: Is it time to frack in Britain?

Climate crisis or the fuel of the future? Our panellists battle it out

by Benny Peiser / June 19, 2014 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Published in July 2014 issue of Prospect Magazine


Britain is on the cusp of a shale gas and oil revolution which could help to rejuvenate the economy and bring cheaper energy to millions of people.

Britain holds one of the biggest shale basins in the world. The British Geological Survey estimates that there could be 1,300 trillion cubic feet of shale gas trapped below the north of England alone. In addition, there are huge reserves of shale oil that lie below many areas of the United Kingdom: recent estimates suggest there could 4.4bn barrels of shale oil in the Weald Basin of southern England and a new report suggests there are even bigger shale oil resources below Leicestershire.

In fact, there are many shale areas in Britain that have not been explored yet. And then there are the country’s gigantic offshore shale reserves which, according to the British Geological Survey, could be five to 10 times bigger than onshore reserves.

In its shale gas report in May 2011, the House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee has applied a conservative recovery rate of 10 per cent to estimate the technically recoverable shale gas reserves. In America, however, advances in fracking technology have pushed the average recovery rate to almost 20 per cent. In some cases, up to 30 per cent of unconventional gas has been extracted.

Britain currently consumes around 2.7 trillion cubic feet of gas per year. If 15-20 per cent of the estimated reserves could be economically recovered it would provide Britons with up to 100 years’ worth of natural gas supplies at current consumption rates—offsetting the depletion of the ageing North Sea fields. It could reinvigorate industrial activity in the north of the country and create a new industry.

YOU'VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
But don't worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we'll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we'll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.
You can unsubscribe from the Prospect e-mail newsletter at any time.

DEBUG messsage: regular

Related articles

As Hammond’s Spring Statement nears, how is the UK economy doing?
Paul Wallace / March 8, 2018
In his pared-down statement on 13th March, “Spreadsheet Phil” will have some better...
The next recession is a question of when, not if
George Magnus / March 12, 2018
The downturn could come in 2020, with implications for both the US presidential election...
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

  1. Chilli
    June 21, 2014 at 19:07
    > The height of a drilling rig is about that of a medium-sized wind turbine, > A single drilling pad could be working around the clock for years.I'm suprised Benny let him get away with this rubbish: The drilling rig is only present on site for 3-4 weeks. Once drilled all that remains is a small single-storey shed on a tennis-court sized pitch like this http://vps.templar.co.uk/Energy%20pictures/Wellhead.jpg except in the UK additional screening hedges would be required so you wouldn't even see it.It should also be noted that one small well like this can reliably generate as much energy as 300 intermittent 2MW wind-turbines which would have a much worse impact on the environment.
  2. mwhite
    June 22, 2014 at 09:18
    Fracking has been going on in Britain for yearshttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2396378/50-year-old-fracking-site-makes-mockery-Balcombe-zealots-Its-nature-reserve--fracked-gas-oil-power-21-000-homes-day--complaints-locals.html
  3. John Rhys
    June 27, 2014 at 17:06
    This is an argument that is largely based on a false premise. The energy industry consensus, by and large, is that, quite unlike the US, fracking will not be a game changer here, and will not deliver either substantial volumes or lower prices. Its prospects have been seriously over-hyped, particularly by government ministers.But a more interesting question for the remedial economics class would be an explanation of exactly why a natural resource endowment is automatically assumed to boost industrial competitiveness. When British industrial competitiveness was being wrecked in the 1980s, Thatcher ministers happily latched on to the the (John Kay/ Peter Forsyth) thesis that the loss of industry was a natural, inevitable, and desirable consequence of our resource endowment of North Sea oil, ie the exact opposite effect of what Benny Peiser is now arguing.Even your current issue provides a good counter-example in contrasting the "competitiveness" of Israel and oil rich Saudi Arabia, but there are plenty of other contradictions to the equation of low energy prices and competitiveness. Germany is widely seen as the most competitive European economy but has had among the highest energy prices, as have most of the Asian tigers. Subsidising domestic industry by limiting energy exports or subsidised domestic prices has been a widespread recipe for economic failure, in the Middle East and elsewhere.
  4. John Tilston
    July 1, 2014 at 00:10
    Maybe we are all getting ahead of ourselves. We don't know enough about UK's shale yet. More exploration is needed, constrained by appropriate regulations. Let's just take this one step at a time.
  5. Paul Cairns
    July 3, 2014 at 00:29
    It is a pity the pair Prospect invited to debate fracking have taken such simplistic, parochial positions. The real issue here, as with all remaining fossil fuel reserves, is that it should not be extracted and burnt - however great the "bounty" lying under the ground. There is virtually complete scientific consensus (not just "broad agreement") that global warming is underway and will, in time, cause unparalleled mayhem for the human race. Whether or not fracking can be achieved without some minor (in comparison) environmental inconvenience or ugliness misses the point. We have to stop, almost completely, putting more carbon-dioxide into the air.The popular clamour for cheap energy is the last thing that politicians should heed. The price-to-consumer mechanism is the most potent instrument for reducing fuel burning. What people actually need is affordable comfort in their homes and industry's needs are parallel ("we have to be able to do what we need to do but usingless energy and getting that without burning fossil fuel"). We can, easily and cheaply, build houses that do not require heating - but can't be bothered. Bring in a new era of cheap (fracked) gas and what will happen? Consumption is hardly likely to fall.We live in a society with a prodigious appetite for energy and much of it is quite unavoidably required (e.g. for food production, distribution and storage). So, we have an unavoidable, solemn duty to husband our power use extremely meticulously. Renewable sources remain unlikely to ever fill the gap - not least because of their intermittent availablity and the enduring lack of cheap scalable energy storage. The future will be nuclear - no two ways about that. Our efforts must be ploughed into rigorous energy efficiency coupled with developing safer ways of "harnessing the atom" - of which there are many waiting in the wings but shackled by cheap "here and now" fossil fuels. We have no alternative, whatsoever - but we do have a possible path away from massive climate disruption if we have the imagination and the will and vigour to embrace it

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Time to rip up the economics textbook and start again? Howard Reed says the discipline needs rebuilding from first principles. Also: Sonia Purnell on Jacob Rees-Mogg's chance of cracking No 10; Will Self on his first acid trip

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

Rip it up and start again: the case for a new economics

In defence of the economists

Back to school: top economists on what their subject needs to learn next

Britain is not ready for exit now and it won’t be in six months—let’s extend Article 50

In defence of the economists

5 Comments

Brexit will no longer be a significant event

3 Comments

Why I won’t be leaving Labour over anti-semitism

3 Comments

Remainers seem to think the EU can be reformed if we stay in—here's why we should be sceptical

2 Comments

Assad is the problem—intelligent intervention could help remove him

2 Comments

About this author

Benny Peiser
Benny Peiser is Director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation
More by this author

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Jesse Norman

    London, 2018-07-16

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Henry Marsh

    London, 2018-06-18

  • Details

    HowTheLightGetsIn 2018

    Hay-on-Wye, 2018-05-25

See more events

Sponsored features

  • The Commonwealth has put vision for everyone on the world’s agenda— now we must act

  • Brexit and the future of industry

  • Seeing Clearly

  • Meet the brains behind Exo

  • Transfer your old ISA accounts and boost your tax-free savings

PrimeTime

Prospect was originally founded by Editor David Goodhart and Publisher Derek Coombs, as a home for intelligent debate. The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities. The aim is to tackle the big challenges confronting society, through rigorous thinking and fine writing.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Steve Bloomfield
Executive Editor: Jay Elwes
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Stephanie Boland
Deputy Digital Editor (Political Correspondent): Alex Dean
Design: Mike Turner
Production Editor: Chris Tilbury
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Finance Manager: Pauline Joy
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulations Executive: James Hawkins
Head of Research and Engagement: Saskia Perriard-Abdoh
Events Coordinator: Oliver Ward
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Senior Account Manager: Sophie Ryan 020 3372 2927
Senior Account Manager: Dominic Slonecki 0203 372 2972
Account Manager: Scott Smith 020 3372 2931

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days..
PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.
You can unsubscribe from the Prospect e-mail newsletter at any time.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.