Culture

Google reopens the debate over digital privacy

March 11, 2009
Has Google allowed advertisers too much access to our online usage?
Has Google allowed advertisers too much access to our online usage?

Google's controversial move today to introduce a global display advertising system, allowing advertisers to target internet users based on their online histories, has once again brought to the fore the issue of internet privacy. This topic was broached in last October's edition of Prospect, where Peter Bazalgette argues that, if certain simple principles of privacy were respected, the behavioural tracking technology could "unleash extraordinary new growth in online commerce," as well as improving online experience. He also advises privacy groups to "maintain a sense of balance" when making the case for customer privacy in all circumstances:

Yes, they must pursue their legitimate lobby for privacy and the rights of individuals. They often help stop genuinely dangerous breaches of privacy. But they pay scant regard to how tracking improves our online experience, and more or less ignore how critical behavioural tracking will be to the future economy. Without it, advertising revenues will collapse and with it the media industry. Privacy matters. But privacy groups' current lack of flexibility is certainly not in the interests of consumers.


However, Bazalgette's economic argument for behavioural tracking technology is disputed by Becky Hogge in Prospect November 2008, who states that "it actually presents a threat to the growth in online commerce". Hogge (who is executive director of digital civil rights organisation the Open Rights Group) also questions the legality of such technology, and maintains that we should control our relationships with media and corporate outlets:
[The technology] subverts these crucial, commercial relationships between businesses and their customers. It works by dialling directly into your ISP’s network, intercepting communications between you and the websites you visit, to ascertain what sort of things you are looking at. It's as if the postman were being paid to open every letter he delivered to you, just in order to send you a better class of junk mail.
Is the move by Google an unwelcome infringement of personal privacy, or are campaigners like Hogge worrying unnecessarily? Would the tracking technology have any influence on your online usuage? Let us know you thoughts.