Is he engaged in a lasting strategic move away from his past, or just making short-term tactical concessions?by Peter Kellner / September 28, 2015 / Leave a comment
An easy cliché for starting a commentary is to say that such-and-such a person or institution is at a crossroads. In my sporadic attempts to avoid clichés, it’s a metaphor I try to avoid. But sometimes it really does sum things up. Writing this blog at Labour’s conference in Brighton, I am observing a party that truly is at a crossroads.
In the fortnight since Jeremy Corbyn won his stunning victory, he has chosen, or been forced, to temper positions he has held for more than three decades, on issues ranging from Europe to Trident, from wearing a red poppy to singing the national anthem. But the big question is not really being asked, and certainly not answered: is Corbyn engaged in a lasting strategic move away from his hard-left past, or is he simply making short-term tactical concessions while he builds up his power base inside the party?
We know that most MPs and many members of his shadow cabinet are appalled that he is leader at all. And, on the opening day of conference, his declared wish to hold a debate on the future of Trident was rejected by delegates. This rebuff looks especially significant, for Corbyn keeps telling us that he wants to restore conference’s power to determine party policy. Could it be that conference, far from egging Corbyn on to ever more left-wing policies, will act as a moderating influence now and for years to come?
I’m not so sure. This year’s delegates reflect the party as it was when Corbyn was seen, not least by himself, as a no-hope ou…