Labour’s new policy will only win the support of the country if couched in the right languageby Steve Bloomfield / February 26, 2018 / Leave a comment
For the first time since before the EU referendum campaign began, a major political party has a stance on Brexit that most of its politicians and members can support. Jeremy Corbyn’s decision to back a customs union has, for the moment, managed to unite the vast majority of his party. There are still those who want to stop Brexit and there remains a minority within the party that will expect nothing other than a hard Brexit, but even those two groups found something to be happy about—arch Remainer Chris Leslie said the speech was “welcome,” but didn’t go far enough, while Frank Field told the Financial Times the position was “marvellous” because, in his view, it would make no difference.
Labour’s new position is also one that several Tory MPs should be willing to back—something Theresa May is all too aware of, hence her decision to postpone a vote on the Trade Bill, which supporters of a customs union had threatened to amend.
But winning the support of politicians is not the same as winning the support of the country. And to do that, Soft Brexiteers and Remainers alike will need to start talking in a different language. Put simply, those in favour of Britain remaining in a customs union need to stop calling for Britain to remain in a customs union.
Too often those involved in politics—politicians, journalists and those obsessed with the minutiae of policy (for example Prospect readers)—forget that most people only take a passing interest. They are not following detailed debates about the pros and cons of a customs union (let alone the very real differences between “a” customs union and “the” customs union). If a politician says Britain should remain in a customs union, they will hear the words “remain,” “in” and “union” and—understandably—assume that the speaker wants Britain to remain in the European Union.