• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Politics

Junior doctors row: has Jeremy Hunt been politically savvy?

His stubbornness could pay off—or it could backfire catastrophically

by Peter Kellner / February 12, 2016 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email
Protesters outside the Department of Health in London, as junior doctors have pledged to fight on after Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt announced he will impose a new contract on thousands of medics in England.

Those protesting Health Minister Jeremy Hunt’s plans to impose new contracts on junior doctors group outside the Department of Health in Westminster, London, on 11th February 2016 ©Anthony Devlin/PA Wire/Press Association Images

Read more: Junior doctors’ strike—will Corbyn miss an open goal?

Were Harold Macmillan alive today, he would surely update his famous injunction: “There are three bodies no sensible man directly challenges: the Roman Catholic Church, the Brigade of Guards and the National Union of Mineworkers.” These days it would make far more sense to substitute the British Medical Association for the virtually defunct NUM.

The Government’s dispute with junior hospital doctors looks like an exercise in political madness. Polls show that voters sympathise with the strikes. Jeremy Hunt, the health secretary, no doubt hoped that cancelled operations would turn the public against the doctors. If anything, it is Hunt who is losing ground. He, not the BMA, is being blamed for the disruptions and delays in our hospitals.

However Hunt should not be surprised. Every time YouGov asks people how much they trust different groups to tell the truth, doctors come near the top and politicians near the bottom. I doubt whether many people really understand the details of the proposed new contract, and whether the typical junior doctor doing a typical a…

YOU’VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
But don’t worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we’ll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we’ll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time







Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

4501365805c6f9c050ea627.49554410

Go to comments

Related articles

Brady Jandreau in The Rider
The troubles of a rodeo rider and the life of a pop star provocateur—the best films of September 2018
Wendy Ide / August 22, 2018
Plus how a woman is saved by jigsaw puzzles
AM Homes in 2007 © David Shankbone
AM Homes's horror of a higher sort
Rafia Zakaria / August 22, 2018
AM Homes in 2007 © David Shankbone “I am a journalist not a soldier” one...
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

  1. Jeffrey L
    February 13, 2016 at 11:03
    I believe it will back-fire on Hunt for the very simple reason that he has lost the trust of the medical profession, not just the junior doctors. Sadly, he has succeeded only in totally alienating a highly valued and needed professional community.
  2. DAVID_CUTTS
    February 13, 2016 at 13:34
    I don't think that you can blame the mortality figures on the working practices of Junior doctors. This is probably a misreading of the data and Hunt's use of it comes under the category of damn lies. Hunt gets the reaction from his staff that he deserves. They are smart and dedicated people otherwise they would have not made it this far in medicine. The NHS operates 24x7x365. It operates at different levels during that time. What he is doing is trying to get the 'normal working week' to extend through Saturday without hiring new doctors, of which he has not enough anyway. This is a cheap and ineffective way of managing the situation. It is obvious that the NHS capital treatement resoures are not used at full capacity, but to do that you need more doctors, more nurses and more beds to support the core treatment and diagnostic activity. If there is no budget for this it is because the government somehow thinks that the UK can run its health services on a fraction of the proportion of GDP devoted to it in other countries. It can, because the NHS concept is a remarkable shared element of our society which we all support. He and his tightwad friend Osborne will strangle it if they go on at this rate. And if they are trying to put the blame on the doctors they overestimate their political skill and underestimate the nous of the population.
  3. Ian Lang
    February 13, 2016 at 13:38
    You say you're with Hunt on the problem of weekend mortality rates. As a statistician, have you examined the claim and the causal relationship? Saturday and Sunday admissions are more likely to be emergencies, 50% and 65% respectively, than on weekdays (29%) and length of stay is also higher for patients admitted on a Saturday and Sunday. A higher proportion of patients admitted on a Saturday and Sunday have diagnoses that place them in the highest risk of death category, 24.6% and 29.2% respectively, compared with less than 20% of weekday admissions. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/0915/070915-risk-death-patients-NHS-hospitals-weekend It is no wonder that weekend admissions have a higher death rate. It is not because of the poorer quality of their treatment but because non-emergencies are less likely to be admitted then. Are you really with Hunt on this? Have you critically examined it? I have nothing to do with the NHS but I'm interested in evidenced based decision making.
  4. Peter M
    February 14, 2016 at 13:46
    There are a lot dubious observations in the above reply but the most arguable is the old well worn chestnut that the " NHS concept ---we all support". Well no thinking person should. It is a 70 year old concept/design which is well out of date and deserves fundamental if not total change to meet the needs of the 21st century. Something the blinkered and overly politically motivated BMA will never understand.
  5. Tianavaig
    February 16, 2016 at 14:39
    At last someone has said it - the doctors will maybe get back to sanity once they see the new wage packet. All the talk of better, safer care cannot be justified with what they are doing. Shame doctors have now become just ordinary - maybe just technicians who know about the working of the body (and only bits of it). Not like say an architect who needs to know everything (not just stress related issues to walls!! To threaten to leave and take the education we gave them to another country - my goodness how will that make the NHS safer for patients!
  6. Mike Stephenson
    February 16, 2016 at 21:11
    Mr Hunt's row with the Junior Doctors is part of the Tory strategy to advance the already begun privatisation of the NHS. I am an 80 year old who has witnessed the NHS as the greatest humanitarian service in the world. Changes are required all the time but why cannot these be managed by the NHS. The private companies are interested primarily in profit without risk, or very limited risk, offered by the world's greatest taxpayer funded organisation. The end game to please rich shareholders is " how much money can we make out of this? " The present government, committed to the shrinking of the state, can hardly allow a massive NHS national body to flourish as a state enterprise. But an enlightened government would take the NHS back to its founding principles, get rid of the market forces and bring everything under the control of the NHS and start to manage it with courage and purpose for the benefit of the health of the nation. If such government comes forward to do this the support of the electorate of UK will be guaranteed. People are voluntarily supporting the NHS, raising money for research, helping friends to get to appointments, running cafes in hospitals, raffles, sponsored walks - only last year I came across thirty young adults on a sponsored climb of Ben Nevis to support a local hospital, in the name of a friend who'd died of cancer. Everyone reading this knows of spontaneous NHS related fund raising somewhere. Where does this sit along side private, profitable contracts and internal competition.

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Prospect is the leading magazine of ideas. Each month it is packed with the finest writing on politics, culture, economics and ideas. Subscribe today and join the debate.

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

This proposal for breaking the Brexit deadlock deserves serious consideration

Did the SDP really split the left in 1983?

The Duel: Has modern architecture ruined Britain?

Nonsense economics: the rise of modern monetary theory

The invigorating strangeness of Friedrich Nietzsche

The Conservative Party has a problem—it’s no longer conservative

5 Comments

The impact of Brexit on services has not received nearly enough attention

2 Comments

Even if Britain stays in Europe, we need a new constitutional settlement

2 Comments

If May's deal is in flames, Labour should not seek to put out the fire

2 Comments

The naïve optimism of Liam Fox

2 Comments

About this author

Peter Kellner
Peter Kellner is former President of YouGov and a political analyst and commentator
More by this author

More by Peter Kellner

Labour conference: a “staging post” on the way to a people’s vote?
September 18, 2018
Do centrists know how to count?
September 10, 2018
Right now, Theresa May’s best friend is Boris Johnson
August 9, 2018

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Diarmaid MacCulloch

    London, 2019-05-20

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Sue Prideaux

    2019-04-15

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Andrew Roberts

    2019-03-14

See more events

Sponsored features

  • The future of transport: taking Britain into the fast lane

  • Reforming the pension system to work for the many

  • Putting savers in the driving seat: getting the pensions dashboard right

  • To fix the housing crisis we need fresh thinking

  • Tata Steel UK: Driving innovation for the future of mobility

PrimeTime

The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Steve Bloomfield
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Stephanie Boland
Deputy Digital Editor (Political Correspondent): Alex Dean
Creative Director: Mike Turner
Production Editor & Designer: Chris Tilbury
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulations Executive: James Hawkins
Programme Coordinator: Oliver James Ward
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Senior Account Manager: Dominic Slonecki 0203 372 2972

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days..
PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.