• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Politics

Against pragmatism

The vapid philosophy of modern politics

by Alex Worsnip / December 29, 2012 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Like many modern politicians, David Cameron presents himself as a pragmatist. What does that really mean? (photo: University Hospitals Birmingham)

Politicians, commentators, academics—everyone loves the word “pragmatic.” Tony Blair told us on his election in 1997 that what counts is not “outdated ideology” but “what works.” David Cameron famously wrote that he doesn’t “believe in ‘isms’” because “words like communism, socialism, capitalism and republicanism all conjure up one image in [his] mind: extremism.” Earlier this year, Nick Clegg eagerly urged a group of business leaders that the Liberal Democrats would be “sensible and centrist; pragmatic—not dogmatic—at all times.” Over in the US, one of the Democrats’ most effective strategies in the November election was to portray the Republicans as out of touch, crippled by their anti-pragmatic moralism.

Modern politicians—taking their cues from advertising and business—tend to use words which come attached with an aura of positive buzz, often without having a grip on what they actually mean. “Pragmatism” is a classic example. In this case, however, the harm done goes beyond the annoyance caused to pedants and opponents of “political mumbo-jumbo.” Rather, it allows politicians to subtly stifle dissent, and causes us to neglect the most fundamental questions about what our society ought to look like.

YOU'VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
But don't worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we'll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we'll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.
You can unsubscribe from the Prospect e-mail newsletter at any time.

DEBUG messsage: regular

Related articles

Banking depends on public support for its legitimacy
Andy Davis / October 10, 2017
Prospect and Bacs Labour Party Conference round-table discussion Read a companion piece,...
It's time for Britain to capitalise in our world-leading industry
Greg Clark / December 12, 2017
Now is the time to make the most of what we have
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

  1. Alyson
    December 29, 2012 at 23:46
    Indeed it is time that politics was more open about its underpinning principles viz competition, fair play and economic philosophy.The old my gang your gang politics of left and right has gone, along with militant unionism and home-grown bosses. Globalism and the welfare state are the new polarities, with QE the elephant in the room. The debt run up by the bankers, which GB agreed for the state to underwrite, in order to save global monetarism, demands we address the lack of transparency in accounting and accountability, and the gap between players and the grafters for whom a living wage is no longer a realistic expectation.The current debt economy is still working in its way. Perhaps it just needs to be refloated with new money shared equally across the board, and then let's see where that takes us next.Values and individualism need to be spelled out more honestly by savvy political journalists so that we need not all be sold down the river by the few who understand the rules of the game.
  2. chris
    December 30, 2012 at 12:49
    I disagree with your framing the debate of pragmatism in terms of pure ideology. That is less meaningful given the nature of Conservatism in the abstract (preservation of the status quo) and in practice (measured change of the status quo).The primary reason that we are not still having the ideological debates of the past is that Communism failed ('End of history') and Keynesian demand management only led to rising prices. Blair saw that the electability of the Labour party relied on modernising it (removing clause 4) and moving it to the centre ground. There is no inherent reason why a social democratic party should not claim a tougher approach on crime . Likewise Cameron' s shift to the centre is arguably making the Tories more l I keep the 19th century Liberals.It may tempting to blame pragmatism for the obfuscation in modern day politics; the notion of what metric the government should be assessed against are conflicting (GDP vs equality). But I would argue there is a vigorous debate ongoing between Labour and the coalition. Moreover if the complaint is against the very notion of austerity falling on the poor then it should be remembered how we got here in the first place through provision of middle-class benefits etc. Furthermore, while this article criticises the lack of debate regarding the burden of austerity affecting the current generation, I would argue that it is fairer on the next, that will be paying off the £1 trillion in debt that we have run up.
  3. Leeds Debating Union
    December 31, 2012 at 04:26
    Great article Alex
  4. amy
    December 31, 2012 at 15:11
    Nineteenth century laws were not made in light of today's far reaching technologies, and laws have changed at a much slower pace than these technologies, therefore the effects that laws have on public safety made a practical difference between then and now/then. The argument that "pragmatism" is used to as a means of quieting dissent is not a convincing one to my mind, even though it is good to think about what is being proposed and to voice your concern, but not against pragmatism.
  5. jaypal
    January 1, 2013 at 05:15
    careful with some of the words used. words such as ineliminably am not sure exist. Also the word is highfalutin and not high-falluting which does not exist
  6. Luke Alexander
    January 9, 2013 at 00:19
    Nice picture
  7. Edward Harkins
    January 21, 2013 at 13:52
    Surely the exemplar in the matter of pragmatism and politics has to be Harold Wilson, UK Prime Minister in the 1960s and 70s? Indeed, a well-regarded biography of him was entitled 'Pragmatic Premier: An intimate portrait of Harold Wilson' (by Ernst Kay),The witty and teasing title prompted the common response of 'what did he mean by that'? Harold Wilson had utterly divided audiences. There were those who saw him as a true moderniser of 'British' socialism whilst remaining loyal to its precepts. There were some weirdos who inhabited the inept UK security services of that time and who were convinced he was a double agent for the USSR's KGB!. Conversely, there were others on the Left who heartily loathed him; seeing him as an idealogical-averse, commitment-free manipulator. (He himself described himself at one stage as the spider in the middle of a web, tugging at the strands, controlling it all).'Pragmatic' maybe covers it all.Some of this about Harold Wilson may sound like a precursor of Tony Blair and the Labour Party - but there is a notable and honourable difference.Harold Wilson stood up to intense bullying and threats from USA President Lyndon Johnstone who desperately wanted the UK to committed troops to the USA's Vietnam fiasco. Despite the UK's financial penury and desperate need for USA support, Wilson prevailed and kept the UK out of the Vietnam morass.In contrast, Tony Blair keenly and precipitately committed to the USA's Iraq misadventure. The rest is as they say, history. Incidentally, I believe that it remains true that Tony Blair took the UK into more wars than any other Prime Minster ... that was not very pragmatic.
  8. Jimmy Combs
    January 31, 2014 at 20:00
    Alex, nice article. I like to think of myself as a pragmatic person. In the United States we have a constitution and laws that allow Pragmatism to not be destructive. Democracy by itself though, I believe to be very Anti-Pragmatic. Post-Aparthied South Africa is to the delight of the media and Western World is now democratic. But both Blacks and Whites are way worse off than they were during the apartheid. The same thing happened to Rhodesia (Zimbabwe). These countries are complete disasters today. - Here is the Rhodesian Prime Minister in a video where he claims to be "A pragmatic person" And I'm totally on his side. - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0S2NKlMW0vc Placing SA under sanctions was completely wrong and counter-productive and now democracy in Africa has led to low-functioning, un-productive societies. This same issue is happening in black communities in America today as a result of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Should we be worried about tech giants? In this month's issue, John Naughton explains how they've created a new surveillance capitalism. Plus: Samira Shackle on collective punishment after Islamic State, Shahidha Bari on monstrous men and Salman Rushdie answers our questions.

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

What does Momentum really want?

The new surveillance capitalism

As Western politics is reshaped by hatred, cosmopolitans mustn't become part of the problem

If David Cameron had asked the right question on Brexit, Remain could have won

The Brexit struggle awaiting Theresa May in 2018

5 Comments

Remainers need to start telling a better story

3 Comments

Diane James: Nigel Farage is wrong to consider a second EU referendum

3 Comments

The great globalisation lie

3 Comments

The new surveillance capitalism

2 Comments

About this author

Alex Worsnip
Alex Worsnip is a doctoral student and Teaching Fellow in philosophy at Yale University. Follow him on twitter @AWorsnip
More by this author

More by Alex Worsnip

John D Caputo's truth problems
January 10, 2014
What's the point of political philosophy?
May 17, 2013
Arguing against gay marriage
January 30, 2013

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Fergal Keane

    London, 2018-04-16

  • Details

    One year to go—Is Britain ready for Brexit?

    London, 2018-03-29

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Pankaj Mishra

    London, 2018-03-19

See more events

Sponsored features

  • Today’s manufacturing workforce challenge

  • Britain's transport infrastructure: A new vision

  • Brexit Britain: the future of industry

  • Opportunity and need for a new phase of development policy towards the occupied Palestinian territory

  • Beyond the bank

PrimeTime

Prospect was originally founded by Editor David Goodhart and Publisher Derek Coombs, as a home for intelligent debate. The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities. The aim is to tackle the big challenges confronting society, through rigorous thinking and fine writing.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Steve Bloomfield
Executive Editor: Jay Elwes
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Stephanie Boland
Deputy Digital Editor: Alex Dean
Design: Mike Turner
Production Editor: Chris Tilbury
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Finance Manager: Pauline Joy
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulations Executive: James Hawkins
Head of Research and Engagement: Saskia Perriard-Abdoh
Events Assistant: Megan Randles
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Senior Account Manager: Richard Rowe 020 3372 2972
Senior Account Manager: Sophie Ryan 020 3372 2927
Account Manager: Scott Smith 020 3372 2931

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’swebsite for FREE in the next 30 days..
PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.
You can unsubscribe from the Prospect e-mail newsletter at any time.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.