Onwards and upwards
Philip Collins’s article (“The social mobility myth,” October) and the accompanying interview with John Goldthorpe refer to our findings on the decline in intergenerational income mobility in Britain as “mistaken” and “flawed—both empirically and conceptually.”
Many of Goldthorpe’s points are well taken. However, not all the points made in the article and interview are accurate.
The observation that trends in mobility as measured by social class and income differ is not controversial. But just looking at differences across social class groups, as Goldthorpe’s work does, entirely misses important aspects of changes in inequality unrelated to social class…
Register today to continue reading
You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.
You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.
Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.
Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.
Already a subscriber? Log in here