Phillip Blond is right to call for more employee share ownership, workers’ buyouts, equity guilds and asset co-operatives, with ownership wedded to the earning of wages. To attack big business and its mass immigration; to excoriate the impact of the supermarkets on small business and agriculture; to denounce Marx as “just another dispossessor of the poor.” And to laud Chesterton and Belloc.
But he is absolutely wrong to speak of “welfare serfdom,” or to write off “the trade unions as institutions permanently wedded” thereto.
For one thing, of course, trade unions are specifically about jobs, not welfare. A movement “owing…
Register today to continue reading
You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.
You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.
Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.
Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.
Already a subscriber? Log in here