They should exist to help workersby Sonia Sodha / May 16, 2017 / Leave a comment
Published in June 2017 issue of Prospect Magazine
Twelve per cent—that was the dismal turnout in the recent contest to elect the general secretary of Unite. Hence Len McCluskey claimed victory having persuaded fewer than one in 18 members to vote for him. It’s yet another symptom of apathy and malaise in a trade union movement afflicted by a long-standing decline in membership.
Why should we care? Deepening insecurity and sluggish wage growth are affecting the post-crash labour market. Precarious low-paid work—unreliable self-employment, agency working and zero-hours contracts—affects one in ten workers. Employers often face few consequences: enforcement of minimum wage and employment legislation has been under-resourced; workers have been expected to enforce their own rights through employment tribunals where new fees apply.
Unions aren’t doing enough about all this. There are exceptions, such as the efforts of the GMB’s professional drivers’ branch to get Uber drivers classified as workers rather than as self-employed. But there is no sense of a wider mobilisation where it is needed most: membership rates are four times higher in the public than the private sector, and 70 per cent higher among graduates than those with no qualifications at all. Unions represent fewer than one in 10 of the lowest paid.
These statistics shame a movement founded to fight labour exploitation. Unions would argue it’s harder to organise in today’s increasingly fragmented private sector workplaces, especially in a hostile political environment. There’s some truth in that.
There’s been more innovation in the US, where political conditions have also been hard. And yet the Service Emp…