Latest Issue

The month ahead in science

Anjana Ahuja on peer review, Mercury and the paranormal

By Anjana Ahuja   March 2011

Parliament has announced an inquiry into peer review, the sometimes controversial process by which scientific papers are vetted for publication. The Commons science and technology committee has revealed that the inquiry would investigate, among other things, how reviewers are chosen and whether there are alternative methods of gauging research. Peer review is seen as the gold standard for publication but its reputation is not untarnished: the MMR vaccine scare was unleashed thanks to a 1998 Lancet paper that its own editors now admit should never have been published. Interested parties have until 10th March to submit evidence.


After a…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect