Latest Issue

Talking up terror

Intelligence officials systematically inflate the terrorist threat. Ministers must ask the right questions

By Peter Lilley   November 2003

Dramatic events often bring long submerged problems to the surface. The Iraq war and subsequent failure to find weapons of mass destruction highlight several issues about scrutiny, accountability and the use of intelligence. They can be summarised in three questions. Who is to be held responsible for bad advice? How can parliament better scrutinise complex material such as intelligence reports? And should law officers be more accountable?

The key question post-Iraq is: who misled whom about the existence of WMD? Did the government mislead the public, or was the government misled by intelligence assessments? The doctrine of accountability has always…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect