Latest Issue

Perfect shadows

All the bickering about the Royals is beside the point-what matters is the office, not the suitability of the office holder. Roger Scruton says this is better understood in former communist states than in old democracies

By Roger Scruton   January 1996

Monarchy has been so much in the news, and so much the subject of irreverent chatter, that it is not surprising that people seem no longer to understand its meaning. The Princess of Wales is described as an “ambassador for Britain”; the Prince of Wales as an “unsuitable head of state”; the Royal quarrel as “bringing the monarchy into disrepute”-as though we had some choice in the matter. The point of monarchy is that there is no choice. The crown owes its power, longevity and stabilising force to the fact that it passes by law to the person destined to…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect