Who will pay the Tobin tax?by Stephen Nickell / January 27, 2010 / Leave a comment
Published in February 2010 issue of Prospect Magazine
Economist James Tobin first proposed a tax on cross-border currency transactions in the 1970s. The financial crisis has revived the idea of a “Tobin tax” and it was endorsed by Adair Turner, chairman of the Financial Services Authority, in Prospect’s September issue.
A Tobin tax would need to be applied more widely than merely on currency transactions, which could be easily disguised in derivatives trading. A recent study by the Austrian government estimated that a 0.05 per cent Tobin tax imposed on all financial trades in Britain would raise £100bn a year—even assuming a two-thirds drop in transactions. This is an enormous sum, more than 6 per cent of GDP.
But is a Tobin tax a good idea? It would have to be applied multilaterally, or transactions would move elsewhere. Arguments in favour are that it might lower asset price volatility and reduce socially wasteful activity so that clever people could be freed to do something useful. On the other hand, the tax might increase transactions costs, reduce the liquidity of markets and raise the cost of capital.
But I want to focus on another issue: who would pay this tax? Much of the discussion assumes that large sums can be collected from the financial services industry and used to close the budget deficit and much more.
Yet bankers wouldn’t end up paying the tax—they would pass the cost to their customers. So importers, who must trade extensively in foreign exchange markets, would pay more for doing so and pass the extra costs onto consumers. Pension funds would pay extra for their transactions and their investments would generate lower returns for pension holders.