Why so many peace initiatives in the middle east failby Derek Coombs / January 20, 2003 / Leave a comment
Published in January 2003 issue of Prospect Magazine
Tony Blair wanted to hold a middle east peace conference in London this winter. But his advisers have conceded that nothing will happen until after the Israeli election at the end of January, and possibly not until the Iraq crisis is resolved, whenever that might be.
Bush’s middle east policy has zig-zagged wildly since 11th September. And the current “road map” proposed by the US (and formally backed by the UN, the EU and Russia) is not being taken very seriously by anyone in the international community.
It calls for an end to attacks on both sides, a reform of the Palestinian Authority, a halt to further Israeli settlement building, and a provisional Palestinian state on 40 per cent of the pre-1967 West Bank (75 per cent of the Gaza strip) growing to some unspecified size by the time a final agreement is reached in 2005.
The problem with this road map-submitted by Assistant Secretary of State William Burns in October-is that it repeats the same mistake as all the other peace plans of the past few years: it demands of the Palestinians that they give up all forms of armed resistance without spelling out what rewards this will win them.
The Mitchell report, the Tenet proposals, the Zinni mission and even the Oslo accords themselves all did the same. Oslo was clear about what Israel expected to gain straight away-security. But what about the Palestinians? Oslo committed the Israelis to negotiating various “final status” issues but gave no indication of what the Palestinians might expect the outcome to be. The term Palestinian state did not appear in the accords. There was also no provision in Oslo for any international monitoring of the agreement.
The current “road map” repeats these two mistakes. First, the lack of specificity about what the Palestinians might expect their state to look like in 2005 promises a repetition of the frustration created by Oslo. Second, the lack of international supervision means tha…