Latest Issue

Israel lobby: part 2

The idea that the Israel lobby has undue influence over US foreign policy, as argued by Michael Lind in April, is historically and politically illiterate. The US supports Israel because it is in its own interests to do so

By Adam Garfinkle   September 2002

The late Robert Nisbet once wrote that while a half brick is not as useful as a whole one, it can be thrown twice as far. I was reminded of this remark when I read Michael Lind’s essay (Prospect, April 2002) on the Israel lobby. Lind makes a half-brick sort of point, and tries to throw it very far indeed.

The point-that there is an influential pro-Israel lobby in the US, and that it distorts US policy and harms US national interests-is, of course, not new. It has been advanced for years in this country, not least by the late…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect