David Runciman believes that democracy's great strength is its adaptability, but autocracies can prove equally flexibleby Ferdinand Mount / December 12, 2013 / Leave a comment
Published in January 2014 issue of Prospect Magazine
An American political cartoon (1899) showing the Earth brushing away Monarchy to make way for democratically elected government
The Confidence Trap: A History of Democracy in Crisis from World War I to the Present
by David Runciman (Princeton, £19.95)
“If we go on at this rate, the nation must be ruined,” said Sir John Sinclair in 1777. He had brought the news of General Burgoyne’s defeat at Saratoga to his hero Adam Smith. Sinclair was a humourless beanpole of a man, an obsessive statistician who wrote wagonloads of pamphlets on every subject imaginable, the very archetype of an intellectual of the Scottish Enlightenment. He was 23 years old and distraught. Smith was 54 and magnificently unmoved by the news, replying with the immortal putdown, “Be assured, my young friend, that there is a great deal of ruin in a nation.”
Smith was right, as he was right about most things. The war in America staggered on for another four years until the surrender at Yorktown. Lord North staggered on as Prime Minister too, until he was eventually chucked out on a vote of no confidence, the first Prime Minister to suffer this fate. Even then, he bobbed up again as Home Secretary the following year in a new coalition government. In a democracy, even an imperfect one like late-18th century Britain, failure is seldom fatal for long.