Magazine
Latest Issue

Don’t quote me

Is the Oxford Dictionary of Quotations as good as it claims? Nicolas Walter says that its revised fourth edition is still unable to distinguish between the essential, the pointless and the dubious

By Nicolas Walter   January 1997

The Oxford dictionary of Quotations enjoys the reputation of a standard reference book, an essential item for every library, a basic tool for research, a constant companion for dipping, a publication without a rival. Why is it so bad?

The problem is partly one of false expectations. Reference books claim an authority which they do not deserve, as is known by everyone who has ever worked on one. The Oxford dictionaries, books and companions make even more special claims, which are seldom challenged.

The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations (ODQ) has had four and a half editions over more than half…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to letters@prospect-magazine.co.uk

More From Prospect