The attractions of Lifetime ISAs are obvious—but there are drawbacks, tooby Andy Davis / March 15, 2017 / Leave a comment
Published in April 2017 issue of Prospect Magazine
In early April, the ever-expanding Isa family will spawn another member—Lisa, the Lifetime Isa. Anyone aged between 18 and 40 will be able to open a Lisa and benefit from a government promise that for every £1 they put in, up to a ceiling of £4,000 per tax year, the state will add a 25 per cent top up, worth up to £1,000. Provided the resulting fund is used to buy a first home (for no more than £450,000) or is saved for retirement, the 25 per cent bonus is safe. If the holder takes the money out for any other reason, the government top-up is forfeited.
Even allowing for those fiddly conditions, it’s a decent deal—though sadly one for which I am too old to qualify. However, as well as its obvious attractions a number of problems strike me about this new breed of Isa.
The first is that it is another example of a Treasury savings initiative that partially replicates existing tax incentives. The same is true of the Innovative Finance Isa, designed to exempt income from sources such as peer-to-peer loans from tax—it’s a grand idea but the first £1,000 of interest income for a basic-rate taxpayer is already tax-free under the savings allowance (you need an awful lot of money in the bank to earn more than that these days). Still, I guess you can’t have too many incentives to save and for higher-rate taxpayers, who receive only their first £500 of interest income tax-free, the attractions are more obvious.
In the case of the Lisa, the rather more worrying overlap is with workplace pensions: there are at least superficial similarities between the two in terms of tax breaks. Critics worry that young people with limited capacity to save might be tempted to opt out of workplace…