Latest Issue

After Saddam 2

Defeating Iraq would mean America shouldering all the responsibilities of an occupying power-and doing it for years. How do the experts, military and civilian, think it will work out?

By James Fallows   November 2002

I have recently interviewed several dozen people about what could be expected in Iraq after the US dislodges Saddam Hussein. I talked to spies, Arabists, oil company officials, diplomats, scholars, policy experts and many active and retired soldiers. They were from the US, Europe and the middle east. Some firmly supported a pre-emptive war against Iraq; more were opposed.

I began my research with the view that forcing “regime change” on Iraq was our era’s grim historical necessity: starting a war would be bad, but waiting to have war brought to us would be worse. This view depended to some…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect