Latest Issue

Why Federer should have won

By William Skidelsky  

There can be no doubt about it: sport does not get any better. Sunday’s battle was the greatest Wimbledon final of all time, the perfect match in every respect except one: the wrong man won. My admittedly biased view (I’m a Federer fan) is that poetic justice, and the narrative arc of the match, would have been better served by Federer, and not Nadal, triumphing in the dying light. Here are five reasons why:

1) Comebacks make for the best sporting stories, and a victory for Federer would have been the most remarkable of comebacks, eclipsing Murray’s against Gasquet in…

Register today to continue reading

You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.

You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers 2020 and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to

More From Prospect