• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home

Lucy Webster

Education and disability rights

What we should really be saying about tuition fees

Getting rid of fees won't make a fair deal for students, but neither will keeping them as they are

by Lucy Webster / August 11, 2015 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email
Students marching against tuition fees rises in 2010. © LSE Library

Students marching against tuition fees rises in 2010. © LSE Library

With my third year of university on the horizon, I have spent two years engaged in the debate over student fees, which in recent weeks has returned to the mainstream, with the release of a new report on the government’s approach, and two Labour leadership candidates pledging free tuition at the point of delivery. I take a middle view, somewhere between those calling for free education and the current government’s elitist higher education policy.

Tertiary education should not be free. Unlike healthcare or basic education, it is a privilege and generates great rewards. But it should be fair, which means ensuring value for money and making it easier for those from disadvantaged backgrounds to afford. According to a new report from the Independent Commission on Fees, set up in 2012 to evaluate the impact of higher university tuition fees, this is far from the case. While some of the problems expected when the new fees were introduced have been avoided or mitigated, the government and the industry still have a lot to do.

Going to university weighs on someone’s mind from before they go until decades after they have graduated. Some 78 per cent of 16-18-year-olds are “very” or “fairly” concerned about the cost of living as a student, the commission found. Some 68 per cent are concerned about high tuition fees and 58 per cent are worried about having to…

YOU’VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
But don’t worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we’ll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we’ll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time







Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

4691806685c706452e3bb96.40912567

Go to comments

Related articles

Interview: Lisa Nandy—the challenges facing the Labour Party
Alex Dean / November 7, 2018
The MP for Wigan on Labour’s troubling summer and how to move forwards
John Humphrys’s dismal legacy
Julian Baggini / February 6, 2019
The Today presenter preferred to score political points rather than properly interrogate...
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

  1. David Murphy
    August 18, 2015 at 13:33
    I don't agree that STEM subjects get more investment. University of Reading has just announced they are shutting down one of their software engineering departments and Physics was closed down some time ago. They are high cost to run, there are not so many students interested (especially from the UK) and most don't attract much business investment. It seemed at Reading they liked having the humanities because they are cheaper to run. "For £9000 a year I get eight hours teaching over 23 weeks" Is this really the case? That would be one lecture roughly one lecture every three weeks. Did you mean 8 hours per week over 23 weeks? When I was at UNiversity studying History (1977-1980) we had multiple lectures and tutorials every week for three terms (10 weeks per term) and essays were pretty comprehensively marked. I was very prone to splitting infinitives, to the disgust of one of my tutors (an American). In a market system what should happen is that those getting poor value should be complaining and putting off other students. Also perhaps arranging transfers to other, better universities. However it also needs remembering that a university is not going to spoon feed you like you were at 'A' level. As to your answer to the funding and fairness issues, I would like to see the government putting greater funding into useful subjects where there is broader value to society. So subsidies supporting education, STEM subjects. Also, more to support poorer students. Also, better careers advice - how many people taking a degree actually need one? I suspect we have too many students now for what society and especially the economy, actually need. Perhaps we need a broader range of courses, such as were provided by CFEs and Polytechnics years ago - less academic and more geared to helping young people progress. There is no easy answer because the first question is wht? Why universities, what does society want? What purpose do and should universities and other higher education serve? What other forms of education will provide individuals and business what they need ?

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Prospect is the leading magazine of ideas. Each month it is packed with the finest writing on politics, culture, economics and ideas. Subscribe today and join the debate.

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

This proposal for breaking the Brexit deadlock deserves serious consideration

Did the SDP really split the left in 1983?

The Duel: Has modern architecture ruined Britain?

Nonsense economics: the rise of modern monetary theory

The Conservative Party has a problem—it’s no longer conservative

5 Comments

The impact of Brexit on services has not received nearly enough attention

2 Comments

Even if Britain stays in Europe, we need a new constitutional settlement

2 Comments

If May's deal is in flames, Labour should not seek to put out the fire

2 Comments

The naïve optimism of Liam Fox

2 Comments

About this author

Lucy Webster
Lucy is a student in Politics and IR at the University of Warwick and a journalist
  • Follow Lucy on:
  • Twitter
More by this author

More by Lucy Webster

TV debates: ban the Greens and lose the students
January 15, 2015
Why Lord Freud should resign
October 15, 2014
What is the 'West Lothian Question?'
September 22, 2014

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Diarmaid MacCulloch

    London, 2019-05-20

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Sue Prideaux

    2019-04-15

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Andrew Roberts

    2019-03-14

See more events

Sponsored features

  • The future of transport: taking Britain into the fast lane

  • Reforming the pension system to work for the many

  • Putting savers in the driving seat: getting the pensions dashboard right

  • To fix the housing crisis we need fresh thinking

  • Tata Steel UK: Driving innovation for the future of mobility

PrimeTime

The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Steve Bloomfield
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Stephanie Boland
Deputy Digital Editor (Political Correspondent): Alex Dean
Creative Director: Mike Turner
Production Editor & Designer: Chris Tilbury
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulations Executive: James Hawkins
Programme Coordinator: Oliver James Ward
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Senior Account Manager: Dominic Slonecki 0203 372 2972

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days..
PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.