His stance on the “wage cap” changed—several timesby John McTernan / January 10, 2017 / Leave a comment
Where does one start with Jeremy Corbyn’s relaunch? It is an iron law of politics that you should never have one—the only thing that ever happens after one is that the adjective “beleaguered” ineluctably attaches itself to your name, swiftly followed by the intensifier “increasingly.” Still, if you are going to go for it then you should totally go for it, with painstaking preparation and ruthless execution—get your message right and get it across. What you shouldn’t do is change your messaging within the media cycle, which is what Jeremy Corbyn did. As the hours passed—and he began to backpedal, using his speech in Peterborough—headlines about him changed from:
“Corbyn sets out case for higher earnings cap”
“Corbyn: wage cap would be ‘higher’ than my salary, but footballers’ wages are ‘ridiculous’”
“Jeremy Corbyn rows back on proposed cap on wages”
A line that shifts so rapidly is one that hasn’t been thought through. And footballers’ wages are the simplest of all objections to a wage cap. Either Corbyn’s office thought it was sensible—and potentially popular—to pick on them, which is bad enough. Or worse, no-one thought about it at all. In the end, Corbyn settled on the position that company bosses should have their pay limited to 20 times that of their lowest paid workers, if they hope to be eligible for government contracts.