Words that think for us

Prospect Magazine

Words that think for us

by
/ / Leave a comment

Things can only get better, can’t they?

The launch of the “progressive conservatism” project by Demos last year signalled a new milestone in the decline of political language. So meaningless have both terms become that few people noticed the oxymoron. The Conservative party has long since ceased to be conservative. And calling something “progressive” is like calling it “cool”—it creates a frisson of modernity without committing you to anything.

The word “progressive” once meant something a bit more definite. In the early 20th century, it stood for a constellation of ideas on the margins of the socialist movement. Progressive schools such as Summerhill and Bedales ditched chapel and rugger for craftwork and hiking. Progressive intellectuals drew up manifestos of free love, atheism and dietary reform. Some sported sandals and beards. All were middle class. They were the kind of people George Orwell loved to mock.

Then something strange happened. The broad river of socialism dissipated into a

You need to be logged in to see this part of the content. Please either subscribe or Login to access.

Leave a comment



Author

Edward Skidelsky

Edward Skidelsky
Edward Skidelsky is a lecturer in philosophy at Exeter University. His book "Ernst Cassirer: The Last Philosopher of Culture" is published by Princeton University Press 


Share this







Most Read






Prospect Buzz

  • Prospect's masterful crossword setter Didymus gets a shout-out in the Guardian
  • The Telegraph reports on Nigel Farage's article on Lords reform
  • Prospect writer Mark Kitto is profiled in the New York Times


Prospect Reads

  • Do China’s youth care about politics? asks Alec Ash
  • Joanna Biggs on Facebook and feminism
  • Boris Berezosky was a brilliant man, says Keith Gessen—but he nearly destroyed Russia