Performers on Edinburgh’s Royal Mile. Is the fringe too cut off from the world?
While the riots raged in London, Manchester and Liverpool, the Edinburgh festival fringe discussed such pressing matters as the record contracts of Doris Day, the history of freak shows in American vaudeville and the private life of Liberace.
For several weeks each August, the festival blooms in a bubble as comedians peddle their wares, the Traverse theatre becomes an epicentre for new British playwriting and the International Festival brings the world’s greatest musicians and theatre and dance companies to the city’s major venues.
There’s barely time to eat a sandwich, let alone absorb what’s going on in the world outside. And yet there is a paradox about festivals which can justify this self-absorption: the madness is always part of a defiant assertion that life goes on and will improve. Like many great European festivals, Edinburgh’s first festival, in 1947, was conceived as a postwar sign of hope: “to provide a platform for the flowering of the human spirit.”
Even plays about Doris Day can fit this bill, but you probably have to sit down and think about it. This year, the Edinburgh fringe underwent a geographical upheaval as the busiest labyrinth of activity, the Assembly Rooms, relocated from George Street in New Town to George Square in the bustling university area by the Meadows. Here, it joined the other three heartbeat fringe operations that also operate out of unlovely academic headquarters and improvised art deco and plastic tents: the Pleasance, the Underbelly and the Gilded Balloon. This area has now been termed “a fringe village”; it turns its back not only on the world outside, but also on the rest of the fringe.
And yet. One play, Sold, presented by recent graduates of London’s Central School of Speech and Drama, really shook things up. Well, it shook me up. Most reviewers were too busy deconstructing Russell Kane and Benet Brandreth (television personality and ex-MP Gyles’s son, making a creditable debut as a wacky, posh storyteller).
Sold is a verbatim play based on true stories of the modern slave drivers, and their “employees”—often children—working in the human trafficking business. At least 80 children in Scotland were “trafficked” in the past 18 months, according a new report by Scotland’s commissioner for children and young people. This is a £20bn international industry in which the average cost of a slave—a child, a sex worker, a domestic drudge—is £55. Why do our leaders worry so much about regime change in Egypt and democracy in Afghanistan when such inhumane practices continue on our doorstep, 200 years after William Wilberforce supposedly abolished the British slave trade?
Well, that’s what I thought as I left the show and dived into yet another cheery comedy monologue about a nice middle-class chap in glasses losing a girlfriend and buying another tube of toothpaste.
If you walk down Nicolson Street, away from the fringe village, you pass someone with a bruised face and a helpless stare almost every ten yards. Poverty is much more visible in Edinburgh than in London. There were more Big Issue sellers than fire-eaters on the Royal Mile this festival. And yet the fringe, mostly, perpetuates itself as if nothing was untoward, or even happening at all, on the streets around it.
Which is why I look forward, this autumn, to visiting theatre festivals in Dublin and Belgrade. In Dublin, new plays by Colm Tóibín, Marina Carr and the new company Brokentalkers (offering a piece on recently revealed stories of childhood abuse) will take precedence over comedy. And Sinéad Cusack leads a revival of Seán O’Casey’s Juno and the Paycock at the Abbey, still a crucible of the national conscience.
British theatre does not live so near the skin of our history. In Belgrade, at the annual Bitef festival, I’ve seen new work and classics that pullulate with the political atmosphere of the city, and the festival ethos pulls all of that into sharp and often painful focus. Back in 1980, shortly after the death of Tito, I saw a Hamlet that cast the play, prophetically, as one of a crisis of succession in a political vacuum. In 2000, I was borne along the crowded streets, like Woody Allen participating in history in Zelig, as a performance of Chekhov’s Three Sisters coincided with the night of the elections when Milosevic was defeated. An official pop concert was drowned out by improvised speakers blasting the Rolling Stones.
Maybe we shall never see similar scenes in Edinburgh. Perhaps the escape into the cocoon is a good thing; we can only take so much reality, after all. But a festival that throbs with its own local habitation is always more poignant and life-changing, I feel, than one which caters to what passes for popular entertainment these days.


Nick
This is one of the stupider articles I’ve read coming out of Prospect. Coveney likes political drama more than comedy. So what? Perhaps he will be writing future articles about how comedy nights at pubs are too removed from local reality.
Excuse me for being formal, but aren’t there rules that Prospect journalists have to follow? \But a festival that throbs with its own local habitation is always more poignant and life-changing, I feel, than one which caters to what passes for popular entertainment these days.\ I mean, I agree with Coveney 100% about this. But it just sounds like an old person’s lament at going to a festival that didn’t quite fit his personal tastes than a serious article that deserves to be in Prospect. I’m sorry, but I hold Prospect to a higher standard.
GERARD_BRADLEY
Well, I was in Edinburgh for a week of the festival and I have to agree about the beggars and the Big Issue sellers. One of the things we love at Festival time is the Book Festival in Charlotte Square, which the article didn’t mention. I caught an excellent discussion of Scottish economic and social reality at the reading and talk by James Robertson. I couldn’t get tickets to other Scottish writers, (they were sold out) but some of the best social description seems to come from crime writers like Denise Mina.
bobhoskindroadshow
I would suggest Coveney is much closer to the truth. Edinburgh has been an angry and divided for the last several years due to many factors. The £2 billion council debt doesnt help. EdinburghCouncil money being wasted on festival infrastructure doesnt help.
The Fringe especially has been lucky that it wasnt subject to violence this year from local Edinburghers. such is the resentments and anger that is in the air at the moment.
Edinburgh has become a dysfunctional and unproductive city. And the bubble is about to burst for all the boarding school freaks who never integrated in Edinburgh.
Ali Johnstone
The writer strikes me as having a serious need for drama – if this isn’t trying to make a story out of nothing, then I don’t know what is.
You could say the same about any large gathering of people having a good time. While Glastonbury was going on this year we had extended fallout from the Missouri floods, Japanese earthquakes, and the Egyptian, Syrian and Libyan revolutions.
In fact, you might as well draw attention to the fact that while hunger, malnutrition, dehydration and dysentery are some of the most preventable but widespread problems in the third world today, the first world is living in relative luxury and bliss, but all we do is complain about how our housing bubble has burst.
It’s as if the writer just discovered that poverty in UK cities is indeed existent. There were no more drug addled tracksuit models on Nicolsen Street than usual, and of course there are the Big Issue sellers are set up on the Royal Mile – they’d be stupid not to.
This is business as usual, and if it takes the contrast of the festival to bring this to the writer’s attention, he’s more blind to the inequalities of our society than the festival punters he seems to be deriding.
What a waste of time and thought this article is.