Paying for the great unknownby Andy Davis / July 19, 2012 / Leave a comment
Published in August 2012 issue of Prospect Magazine
Just over a year ago, I wrote here about my family’s effort to sort out our 87-year-old mother’s financial affairs by refurbishing her pretty west country cottage and turning it into a holiday let. We had embarked on this project after realising that a move into residential care meant that her (public sector, final salary) pension income would fall well short of her monthly care home fees.
Fourteen months after the first paying guests visited, it’s so far so good. For the moment, it looks as though our mother’s cottage can comfortably cover its own running costs as well as the present shortfall on her care home fees. Naturally, we’re pleased and very relieved—in a time when “safe” investment options pay such paltry, below-inflation returns, the ability of well-maintained property to generate a steady stream of income has once again proved indispensable.
Around the same time our first guests were arriving, a government-appointed commission led by Andrew Dilnot was finalising its recommendations on how Britain should pay for the care of our growing numbers of elderly people. Dilnot’s report, published in July last year, said that the government should agree to meet everyone’s lifetime care costs above a threshold of between £25,000 and £50,000. Dilnot picked £35,000 as a working assumption and this is the figure most often mentioned in the press. Remember this is for the actual cost of care—he also recommended that people who could afford it should pay £7,000 to £10,000 a year towards their own food and accommodation while in residential care.