• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Subscribe
  • Events
  • Home
  • Features

Lost for words

The King’s Speech is the first film to portray my speech defect realistically, says the Man Booker-nominated novelist David Mitchell

by David Mitchell / February 23, 2011 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Published in March 2011 issue of Prospect Magazine

Being the owner of a speech defect, I watch the portrayal of stammerers in the arts with a hypercritical eye. No film (to my knowledge) comes close to the intelligence with which the award-winning The King’s Speech handles the subject of stammering. Scriptwriter David Seidler and actor Colin Firth’s portrait of George VI’s struggles is perceptive, unsentimental and refreshingly accurate.

The future monarch’s speech is dogged by a phonetic band of main offenders—hard Cs and Ks, Gs and Qu-words—plus a narrower group of sporadic “guest” troublemakers: Fs, Phs, and Ws. Bang on. Many fictional stammerers stumble over random letters—a dead giveaway of an under-informed author. Accurate, also, are the observations that you don’t stammer when singing, talking to yourself or swearing, and speech therapist Lionel Logue’s conclusion that the problem is not mechanical—as scientific fashion claimed in the 1930s—but neurological, as scans now prove.

But The King’s Speech’s most singular merit is that stammering is not merely a character handle or a plot device implant, but the film’s star subject. As far as I know, this is a first. The two best-known screen stammerers in British culture to date are Ronnie Barker’s grocer Arkwright in the 1970s and 1980s sitcom, Open All Hours— my, how we laughed—and Michael Palin’s character Ken in the hit 1988 comedy, A Fish Called Wanda. Both exploit the dramatic colour of stammering, but neither offer an ounce of understanding about the phenomenon. Why is this particular dysfunction, lived with by approximately 750,000 people in Britain, represented so dismally and so sparsely in contemporary culture?

*****

I detect a taboo. All disabilities are disabling, but the degree of discomfort they inflict upon the non-disabled varies, depending in no small part on the condition’s “assistability.” Helping a blind person navigate King’s Cross gives the decent-minded Samaritan a certain glow, and inviting a special needs classmate to our child’s birthday party makes us feel civilised. But watching a stammerer suffer a mauling? That’s agony. What can you do, apart from inwardly (or outwardly) wince, and thank God you don’t suffer that mortification every time you’re called upon to read in class, answer the phone or buy a ticket?

YOU'VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
But don't worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we'll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we'll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.
You can unsubscribe from the Prospect e-mail newsletter at any time.

DEBUG messsage: regular

Related articles

Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

  1. Ben Parsons
    March 1, 2011 at 22:05
    Great article. Thank you for expressing what I have dealt with my entire life. Though my stammering may not be as severe as others', I still struggle with it as much as anyone else. I will try to learn to accept it for what it is and "become a non-stammering stammerer."
  2. Sally-Ann
    March 1, 2011 at 23:41
    Thanks David for your very insightful comments. I would like to share this article in my team of SLT's - I'm sure there will be somet new for everyone in what you have written.
  3. Christine
    March 2, 2011 at 21:37
    So many people think that speech impediments, along with many other pathological conditions and disorders that don't have a visible or tangible cause, can just be "set right" by getting it over with and dusting their hands off. I'm sure depression and anxiety were in the same boat as stammering not many decades ago. People tend to view these conditions as the owner's fault, unfortunately.Somerset Maugham was another stammerer. He was so anxious and worried about his stammer that he would enlist the help of younger, self-assured men to go around with him and make introductions on his behalf.
  4. Hetty Collins
    March 2, 2011 at 22:49
    Thank you. Spot on. Describes my life (apart from the novel reading, panel show and satirical appearances) entirely. And thank you for giving me names for all the techniques I've evolved over the years to try and cover my stutter. Also would like to say - that girls stutter too.
  5. arthur
    March 3, 2011 at 12:33
    We heard David Mitchell being interviewed earlier this year (mideelburg, netherlands) but no hint of any speech defect. he almost coudn't be stopped talking and it all went fluently.
  6. Martha Southgate
    March 3, 2011 at 15:57
    What a beautiful piece. My son does not stammer but he has learning disabilities with reading, writing, attention and time management that complicate his life. You've beautifully articulated the lifelong sense of dealing with these things. As a parent, thanks so much
  7. Elizabeth Jackson
    March 3, 2011 at 17:04
    Thank you for 'speaking up' for us stammerers in so many ways. As you say, there is no cure, but I had some useful speech therapy as a teenager in the 1970s. One of the key points I remember from it is that 'technical fixes' are counterproductive because avoiding certain words or certain sounds reinforces your fear of them, and hence your difficulties. This is easier said than done of course - if you'll excuse the pun. Like yourself, I have learned over time not to be ashamed of my stammering, and this, more than anything else, has enabled me to develop a (so far successful) career as a university lecturer. Such a career choice would have been unthinkable in my hellish younger days when even answering the phone or trying to answer a simple question in class was torture. I was not surprised by the comment of someone who had heard you speak fluently. As you say, one of the many unknown truths about stammerers is that we all speak fluently sometimes.
  8. Carla
    March 4, 2011 at 12:10
    Great article! You are right that people who stammer or stutter (terms for the same condition)“are furnaces of willpower.” We have to develop “a sort of militant indifference to how [people]perceive [us]” in order to make it through each day. Good that you shared some advice for those who do not have any problem with their speech. The Stuttering Foundation has some brochures downloadable from their web site (www.stutteringhelp.org) that I have shared with friends, teachers, and coworkers. "Tips for Speaking with Someone who Stutters" has made conversing much easier for me.
  9. Dick Baznik
    March 4, 2011 at 13:45
    Wonderful article! I was first conscious that I stuttered at the age of six, and while I have developed many of the same managerial techniques Mr. Mitchell describes, I still have the problem as I approach the age of 70.As a young student, I was deeply engaged in the study of languages, both classical and modern. I was good at it, and my teachers and classmates assumed I just had "that kind of mind." Little did they know that I had an unusual motivation -- the need for more and more synonyms to substitute for looming troubles in my conversations.Over the course of two decades I went through about seven speech therapists. The worst were the ones whose approaches ranged from telling me to stand in a certain way when speaking or warning me never to consider a career in the public light. The best, who was also the last, understood that I had the capacity to manage stuttering so long as the motivation was there, and that career demands for public speaking can present legitimate motivation.Even if the publicity around TKS doesn't yield a year filled with more understanding about stuttering, I'm happy we've had a good month.
  10. Teresa
    March 4, 2011 at 18:50
    Thank you for a fantastic article! I, too, went through speech therapy in the '70's as a preteen, and seemed to "grow out of it," but maybe it was just the talent of my last therapist. I've gone on to a career as a school teacher, and now I'm the "Story Lady" at the public library, earning my pay doing what I feared most as a child - reading aloud. The frightening thing to me at this time is how this movie (which I'm not sure I can bring myself to see) has brought the memories and fears back to the forefront of my mind, and lately I've felt the catch in my words more than at any time since my high school days. Frankly, I'll feel better when the interest dies down.
  11. Renee Sweet
    March 5, 2011 at 21:32
    I really enjoyed this article. Thank you for your candid remarks and the information. I do not stammer and I especially appreciated your comments on what I can do to avoid being like one of the onlookers from the Wembley speech.
  12. David Mitchell
    March 11, 2011 at 00:22
    I just wanted to thank you all for responding to my article.Individually:Ben P: You're welcome, good luck. You sound pretty sorted, but if my 'policy' helps, great. If not, you'll find your own, no doubt.Sally Ann: Long live dedicated SLTs. If what I wrote helps you and your program, great. You're not just therapists remember, you're emancipators.Christine: I didn't know that about Somerset Maughm. Not the happiest of men. I understand his fear too well to feel any scorn, but his is not a 'technical fix' I would recommend, even if I had the wherewithal to copy it!Hetty C: Yes indeed, many of British Stammering Association members are female. Odd how the default stereotype of a person who stammers is male - maybe popular culture has disseminated this image. You might be mistaking me for the other David Mitchell, by the way - the comedian/columnist/satiricist (if the latter's a word -my spellcheck doesn't think so). So far as I know, he doesn't stammer at all. Don't worry, you aren't the first and won't be the last - especially when he starts publishing novels.Arthur: your comment brought a big fat grin to my face. If any youngish stammerer is reading this, take heart - you can one day be (charmingly) accused of verbosity too! (I had a great time in Middelburg by the way, Arthur - if you're a local, thanks for making me feel so welcome. What an amazing library.Martha S: you're welcome too. Hope all goes well with your lad. It will. It's a long slog, I know, you need ten times the energy, ten times the patience and ten times the positivity of a "normal" parenting context. But it makes you ten times as tough, ten times as compassionate and you learn ten times as much about human beings in general and your own human being in particular. Hang on in there, wear your battle-scars with pride, stuff the disapproving stares in public, and he'll amaze you.Elizabeth J: Way to go. Here's to unthinkable career choices :-)Carla: Thank you for your kind words, and thanks for the link also.Dick B: And thank you too. Your stammer obviously hasn't held you back in life either. Recently I heard Alan Bennett make the observation that literary style is everything that is 'wrong' with how a writer writes. Of course he phrased it better than that, but the point is that all a writer's foibles and indulgences and weak-points and overcomings of those weak-points are what, collectively, make that writer different to any other writer. I love that idea, that it's not what we do right that really matters, but what we do wrong. I think the same principle might be applicable to people, too: whatever is 'wrong' with how our brains are wired up, that, collectively, is what makes us unique, what influences our interests and paths through life, what informs our individual views of the world, and is what bestows upon us particular insights and perspectives which we can share with others, and how we can help them. Put more succinctly, stammerers are world-class experts on how to live with speech disfluencies, and how to create a more helpful and enlightened understanding of stammering. There's massive room for improvement. Let's make that our mission, whenever we get the opportunity. We can do better than Somerset Maughm.Teresa: I know where you're coming from, and if 'non-examination' of your stammer is an effective strategy for you, I wouldn't knock it, even though it never worked for me. I hope interest in stammering stays engaged and informed, because speech therapy intervention needs to be properly funded and GPs need to stop saying, 'Oh, he (or she) will grow out it.' But equally I hope that a higher profile for stammerers doesn't cause a relapse for you. Good luck, whatever happens.Renee S: Clearly, you mean well and you want to understand. I don't think a stammerer could ask anything more.
  13. Molly Colin
    March 11, 2011 at 02:32
    Thank you for writing this meaningful piece. A related bit is what it's like when you're trying to speak a foreign language, or can't. My stammer and stutter came back (in English and Russian) while living in Russia for a year. I touch on this in a piece I wrote recently. http://therumpus.net/2011/02/molly-colin-the-last-book-i-loved-my-life-as-a-russian-novel/
  14. Will Sleath
    March 23, 2011 at 17:19
    Really enjoyed this article too. I am in the category that I sometimes kid myself I have reached the "non-stammering stammerer" stage, then of course the stammer turns around and tells you not to be so silly.In fact for me, the relationship with the stammer is a bit different - not an enemy, but something you want to outwit and get satifaction when you do. In fact "Outwitting the stammer" is maybe another technique for the list, shifting suddenly to a regional accent or a different pitch. Though it sounds odd to the listener, of course. (I absolutely share Molly's experience about foreign languages, French in my case, accentuaing the issue).And maybe this is middle age taking over, but I also find now that years of my brain working on parallel tracks - what to say and can I say it - mean that I sometimes say completly the wrong word in a sentence now, even when not stammering. The mental overload of doing both just seems to being a disconnect.Thanks again for the article
  15. Paul Mason
    March 24, 2011 at 05:01
    I met David Mitchell in a small town in Herefordshire back in (I think) 2005, and, knowing nothing of his novels, found him both refreshingly modest and a fluent and engaging speaker.It occurs to me that those of us who are ordinarily labelled 'non-stammerers' might benefit from turning things on their head and realising that we, too, are simply stammerers who have learned, like David Mitchell (though perhaps without the herculean effort and intelligence) to cope with it. Actually, for me this makes sense, when I consider the times I've been tongue-tied, or having to make speeches.
  16. Tim King
    March 24, 2011 at 06:24
    Thank you for such a very good article David. And how generous to reply to those who have expressed their gratitude. This post is not about stammering (so don't reply to it)but your Alan Bennett quote and your extension of that(which is also spot-on): it made me think of Jean Cocteau's "What others criticise in you, cultivate. That's the real you."
  17. Feurmann
    April 20, 2011 at 00:48
    It's always heartening to hear about a fellow sufferer who has overcome his affliction. (Women are far less often stutterers, for reasons that aren't well understood.) Gratifying also that the film is evidently well researched and doesn't just portray a stuttering character as a dithering figure of fun. I wish it every success (particularly being an Australian), but could never go and see it.David is fortunate in being a writer, and thus mostly (I suppose) sef-employed. My stutter has been responsible for me underachieving professionally. Most jobs over a certain level require good communication skills, and what most people mean by that is talking. If you apply for those (and I must have applied for over 100 jobs), somehow a fluent candidate always wins. Not an excuse to give up? How about if, in my case, you've thought of suicide? I have decided to stop setting myself up for failure and concentrate on the rest of my life; playing an instrument, spending time with my wife. Waiting to retire. But bitter? Sometimes, for sure.
  18. Matthew
    May 7, 2011 at 11:16
    Hi David,I very much enjoyed listening to your interview with Kim Hill broadcast on radio nz this morning.Your discussion of stammering is fascinating. I thought your comments on the both the genetic / environmental causality of the condition and the phenomenological expression of it through enveloped points of view between stammerer and interlocutor were extremely well put. So well put it lead me here and I was delighted to see that you had replied to a number of the comments above. As such I wanted to ask whether you'd ever come across the great writings of Gilles Deleuze which use stammering and stuttering as a philosophical / critical motif. I suppose the most concerted piece is one entitled (translated as) 'He Stuttered'. If so I really wondered what you made of his particular use of the condition.Thanks for your indulgence.
  19. Betty Vanderstoop
    May 11, 2011 at 04:51
    Hi David, Just wanted to thank you for this enlightening piece. I am a member of the Best Book Club in Canada and this coming Friday night we will discuss your book "Black Swan Green". It was my turn to choose, so I am very curious how well it will be received. I am 77, but could still remember how awkward I felt at times in grade school, even though I was not a stammerer. Your book brought back memories of feeling inadequate in different ways, but still relatable to your Jason Taylor. That feeling never completely faded away. I know though that one is never too old to learn. Good luck, David, in your future writing endeavours. (One of our daughters is working hard at following you in your footsteps.) From me to you best wishes. I would like to say: Have a VERY good life! Greetings from Betty Vanderstoop
  20. Jochen
    April 29, 2012 at 15:56
    Thank you very much, David Mitchell, for your frankness and this invaluable insight. Jochen
  21. From stammerer to master of words: David Mitchell’s Black Swan Green | Tea, Books & Thoughts
    October 22, 2012 at 14:46
    [...] recommend his article Let me speak on the website of the British Stammering Association and the interview on the same website. He has also written an essay about the movie The King’s Speech which [...]

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Time to rip up the economics textbook and start again? Howard Reed says the discipline needs rebuilding from first principles. Also: Sonia Purnell on Jacob Rees-Mogg's chance of cracking No 10; Will Self on his first acid trip

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

Rip it up and start again: the case for a new economics

Back to school: top economists on what their subject needs to learn next

In defence of the economists

The constant Gardiner

In defence of the economists

5 Comments

Why I won’t be leaving Labour over anti-semitism

3 Comments

Brexit will no longer be a significant event

3 Comments

Voters think Brexit is being badly mishandled—so why do they still support it?

2 Comments

Rip it up and start again: the case for a new economics

2 Comments

About this author

David Mitchell
David Mitchell is the author of “Cloud Atlas” and a patron of The British Stammering Association: www.stammering.org
More by this author

More by David Mitchell

Acknowledgements
October 22, 2005

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Jesse Norman

    London, 2018-07-16

  • Details

    Prospect Book Club—Henry Marsh

    London, 2018-06-18

  • Details

    HowTheLightGetsIn 2018

    Hay-on-Wye, 2018-05-25

See more events

Sponsored features

  • Supporting UK businesses trading overseas

  • The Commonwealth has put vision for everyone on the world’s agenda— now we must act

  • Brexit and the future of industry

  • Seeing Clearly

  • Meet the brains behind Exo

PrimeTime

Prospect was originally founded by Editor David Goodhart and Publisher Derek Coombs, as a home for intelligent debate. The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities. The aim is to tackle the big challenges confronting society, through rigorous thinking and fine writing.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Steve Bloomfield
Executive Editor: Jay Elwes
Managing Editor (Arts & Books): Sameer Rahim
Head of Digital: Stephanie Boland
Deputy Digital Editor (Political Correspondent): Alex Dean
Design: Mike Turner
Production Editor: Chris Tilbury
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Finance Manager: Pauline Joy
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing and Circulations Executive: James Hawkins
Head of Research and Engagement: Saskia Perriard-Abdoh
Events Coordinator: Oliver Ward
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Senior Account Manager: Sophie Ryan 020 3372 2927
Senior Account Manager: Dominic Slonecki 0203 372 2972
Account Manager: Scott Smith 020 3372 2931

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prospect Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days..
PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Not Now, Thanks

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.
You can unsubscribe from the Prospect e-mail newsletter at any time.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.