Former Education Secretary Justine Greening. Photo: David Mirzoeff/PA Wire/PA Images

Justine Greening has come out in favour of a People’s Vote—but with a twist. Instead of a binary choice—say, compromise deal versus no Brexit—she wants voters to judge three options: no Brexit, compromise or hard Brexit.

It would certainly be novel. Other countries have occasionally held multi-choice referendums; but these have generally been first-past-the post choices, such as when Australia picked Advance Australia Fair as its national song in 1977. What Greening wants is for voters to give their first and second choices. If none of the options wins 50 per cent support, the least popular option would be eliminated, and the second choices of its supporters counted.

There is nothing intrinsically wrong in constitutional innovation. However, Greening’s proposal raises an important question of democratic choice when more than two options are on the table. In short, how do we measure which is most popular when none of the options wins 50 per cent of first preference votes?

Here is one scenario. It is emphatically not a prediction but it is, I believe, plausible. Suppose this is how the UK votes in a Greening referendum

No Brexit: 38 per cent (Second preferences: Compromise 30 per cent, Hard Brexit 8 per cent)

Compromise deal: 30 per cent (Second preferences: Hard Brexit 20 per cent, No Brexit 10 per cent)

Hard Brexit: 32 per cent (Second preferences: Compromise 25 per cent, No Brexit 7 per cent)

Here are three ways the nation’s choice could be calculated.

1. First-past-the-post: No Brexit has the most votes, so the UK stays in the European Union

2. YOU’VE HIT THE LIMIT

   You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
   But don’t worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

   When you register we’ll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we’ll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time

   
   

   
   
   Email
   
   
   

   Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

   Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.