• Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Date/Time
  • Login
  • Subscribe

logo

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Puzzles
  • Events
Home
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Politics
  • Economics & Finance
  • World
  • Arts & Books
  • Life
  • Science
  • Philosophy
  • Puzzles
  • Events
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Jonathan Derbyshire
  • Temptations of empire: a conversation with David Bromwich

Jonathan Derbyshire

The world of ideas

Temptations of empire: a conversation with David Bromwich

by Jonathan Derbyshire / May 22, 2014 / Leave a comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

David Bromwich is Sterling Professor of English at Yale University. Over the past decade or so, Bromwich has carved out a second career as a social critic, writing regularly in publications such as the New York Review of Books and the London Review of Books. Much of his writing there on the depredations of American power since 9/11 has been collected in a new book, “Moral Imagination“, which also contains essays on the history of American exceptionalism and the nature of cultural identity. The book establishes, too, a sort of pantheon of Bromwich’s moral and political heroes—notably Edmund Burke, Abraham Lincoln and Dr Martin Luther King.

I spoke to Bromwich on the phone recently and began by asking him whether there are any models he consciously tries to emulate when writing in the journalistic, rather than the academic, mode.

DB: The models for it come mostly from the 19th and early 20th centuries. Hazlitt is one. Edmund Wilson and Lionel Trilling are also writers I’ve learned from. Also Dwight Macdonald and Harold Rosenberg. And more than any of them, Orwell. Not, I would add, for the standard reasons—which I take to be because he told the truth about communism. Re-reading Orwell, I’ve found him to be quite an eccentric and disturbing writer, sometimes in ways I don’t find easy to admire. There’s a streak of cruelty in him. I think that was something he recognised in himself. And there’s maybe a streak of cruelty in the desire to tell the truth. He talks about this in his essay “Why I Write”. He realised early that he had an aesthetic interest in words and how to put them together, and a capacity for facing “unpleasant facts”. There’s no American who’s quite his equal. But then again, there’s been no British writer his equal either.

It is great to see that you are enjoying the Prospect website.

You have now reached your allowance of 3 free articles in the last 30 days.
Don’t worry—to get another 7 articles absolutely free, just enter your email address in the box below.

You are in complete control of which 7 articles you choose to read. Register now to enjoy more of the finest writing on politics, economics, literature, the arts, philosophy and science.

When you register, we’ll also send you our free e-book—The past in perspective—which considers how reflecting on the past can give great insight into the present AND we’ll send you our free weekly newsletter. (If you prefer not to receive the newsletter you can unsubscribe at any time).

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.
You can unsubscribe from the Prospect e-mail newsletter at any time.

DEBUG messsage: regular

Related articles

176_washington
Washington Watch: midterms
Renegade / October 20, 2010
The hard-fought November midterms will be the most expensive elections in US history
Five fine speeches...and two that went a bit awry
Sam Leith / September 22, 2011
1. Satan in Hell: There’s no orator to compete with the Prince of Lies. The speech ...
Share with friends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email

Comments

  1. me
    May 23, 2014 at 18:50
    He teaches at Yale for crying out loud, he is really brave! Gosh
    Reply
  2. StephenKMackSD
    May 23, 2014 at 19:45
    While I find myself in agreement and sympathize with Mr. Bromwich on the question of Liberals, I too find myself as a Democratic Socialist ,going to Conservative thinkers and writers, that don't follow the Neo-Liberal Party Line. I find a great many conservatives who articulate an anti-imperial politics more congenial than the Liberals, who cannot emancipate themselves from Obama worship, to do something resembling independent thinking. As much as I admire Mr. Bromwich as observer and political moralist, for me the question of Mr. Bromwich's credibility will hinge on the question of Ukraine. Where he used to publish regularly, The New York Review of Books, has become the publishing outlet for Mr. Timothy Snyder's regular essays, that in sum represent simply an extended apologetics and rationalizations for the coup. (Perhaps Mr. Ignatieff and his R2P zealots have colonized that publication?) While ignoring the subversion of a duly elected but corrupt regime by Victoria Nuland, her five billion dollars, and The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and other NGO's. Not to speak of the Svoboda and Right Sector's involvement in the coup, and the present regime ruled by American front man 'Yats'. Paul Craig Roberts, Global Research, MintPress, The Nation and Stephen F. Cohen are the voices I listen too, besides reading the avalanche of hysterical propaganda. Mr. Bromwich represents what used to be revelatory and indispensable at the NYRB, in fact I would say that he is the natural inheritor of the mantle of Murray Kempton, who managed to meld exquisite style with a commitment to the cultivation of civic republican virtue. On the question of Niebuhr I will vigorously dissent! As Mr Fox's biography illustrates, Mr. N. was a moral , political conformist, not to speak of a compulsive proselytizer and careerist. The formation of the ADA with his 'Cold War Liberal' twin Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. was a monument to the 'Liberalism' Mr. Bromwich so eloquently eviscerates. StephenKMackSD
    Reply
  3. PED
    May 24, 2014 at 03:23
    I prefer to think that Obama's increasingly frequent references to the United States as "the unique, exceptional and indispensable nation" are a concession to politics and public opinion rather than a sincere belief. The real disgrace is that the American people will not allow their leaders to think in any other way.
    Reply
  4. DMS
    May 24, 2014 at 07:45
    Whew! I can't possibly compete with StephenKMackSD (above) as to dropping personalities so I'll just stop in admiration.
    Reply
  5. Fran Macadam
    May 24, 2014 at 15:11
    Derbyshire sympathetically interviewing Bromwich? Now that really does offer hope for reconciliation and redemption.
    Reply
  6. philadelphialawyer
    May 25, 2014 at 18:15
    Excellent interview. "Some of the political commentators you find in The American Conservative—for example, Daniel Larison. Some of the sharpest critiques of American imperialism under Bush-Cheney and now under Obama have come from Patrick Buchanan. In some ways he’s a very bad man, but he’s a consistent anti-imperialist. When I say this to liberal friends, they say, 'How dare you read this man!'" And the same might be said of the Pauls. Indeed, my liberal friends are also quite quick to cut off the notion that anyone on "the right," be they libertarians or paleo conservatives, might have something useful to say about imperialism, the war on drugs, the criminal justice system generally, the spying issues, and so on. There is a sense among the "Coastals" (DC to Boston, LA to Seattle), that anyone not of the "in group," ie anyone from the South, the Mountains, the Great Plains, and maybe even the Midwest too, must be an idiot. And, even on the Coasts, that only those folks from a certain environment: urban, liberal Jewish or Protestant, at least college educated, count, in any meaningful way. For all the talk about the Right being annihilationist and "you're with us or you're against us" and eliminationist and denying legitimacy to the left, the left does much the same thing, but only more sotto voce and less in your face. Romney and McCain represent, to them, the very outer limit of what can be talked about in polite society, and not even them during their election bids. The notion that a Paul might have a good idea is hulled down immediately. Why, he opposed the Civil Rights laws! And so he does. But he also opposed the Iraq War and the entire GD national security State, and that should count for something too. Hillary and Obama too (for all his pretense to the contrary) supported the Iraq War and continue to support the national security State, even as they also support the CR laws. Why is that OK? Why the one and not the other? Indeed, why is the one the preferred, the "only" option, while the other is unspeakable? I think Obama is nicely summed up as well. He's smart. He's well educated. He is clearly in another league altogether, intellectually and in terms of policy, when compared to his predecessor. And yet there is a mediocrity to the man. A sense of, "well, I am to the left of Bush and his insane followers and to the right of the DFH's, and so, I must be right." And not only does he manifest this moral laziness, but he does so in a way that oozes arrogance. Here we have a man who rose to prominence based on his ability to write and give a speech. And he is quite good at it. And yet it seems he can't be bothered to do much of it, or any other "politicking," in favor of his policies, nominations, budgets, and proposed legislation. Its as if he seems to think that, because he is "clearly" right, everyone, including the die hard oppositional/obstructionist GOP, will just HAVE to go along with him, because they will look stupid otherwise. As if he doesn't recognize (1) that there actually can be legitimate, non stupid opposing views, (2) that there are ways of presenting opposing views so that they don't look stupid, even if and when they are, and (3) that many folks really either don't mind stupidity (or actually revel in it, a la the fans of Rush Limbaugh) or else don't consider it nearly as important as tribal loyalties, racism, etc. And, of course, nobody in national American politics (ie Presidents, would be presidents, ex presidents, secretaries of state, and so on) can or will admit even the slightest doubt about the entirely false notion of a benign, "exceptional" America. As the man says, Vietnam has been written right out of the story. As has, I would add, Central America, southern Africa, Iran, and many other places as well. Virtually no one in American politics at any level comes even close to recognizing the two simple points that Chomsky, and some on the libertarian/paleo conservative right, have made over and over again in the most convincing fashion......(1) that the US, for all of its talk about exceptionalism and being a shiny city on a hill and so on, actually SHOULD be judged on how will it follows the rules of International Law and basic reciprocal fairness that we use to judge other countries (and, indeed, when it comes to fairness, all other entities and persons) and (2) that by actually looking at the real evidence and engaging in a real evaluation, the US has fallen short in those regards repeatedly, and repeatedly in the same ways, and to devastating effect on other polities, countries and peoples.
    Reply

Leave a comment

You can log in to post a comment under your subscriber name.

Human verification - please type the words/numbers from the image:

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.

This Month's Magazine

Perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus.

Prospect is the leading magazine of ideas. Each month it is packed with the finest writing on politics, culture, economics and ideas. Subscribe today and join the debate.

Subscribe

Most Popular

  • Read
  • Commented

America: the failed state

Reason and romance: The world's most cerebral marriage

How John Berger taught us to see

Prospect’s most read articles of 2016

1917—365 days that shook the world

The one Brexit question that matters: is Article 50 revocable?

12 Comments

The UN—Israel's best friend

5 Comments

1917—365 days that shook the world

4 Comments

What are "British values"?

3 Comments

Kafka's metamorphosis

2 Comments

About this author

Jonathan Derbyshire
Jonathan Derbyshire is Executive Comment Editor at the Financial Times, and former managing editor of Prospect
  • Follow Jonathan on:
  • Twitter
More by this author

More by Jonathan Derbyshire

Ian Kershaw—the fall and rise of modern Europe
December 26, 2015
How to beat Marine Le Pen
December 11, 2015
The big ideas of 2016: bipolar Britain
December 10, 2015

Next Prospect events

  • Details

    Prospect at LSE Space for Thought Literary Festival 2017

    London, 2017-02-20

  • Register

    Prospect Book Club - Elif Shafak

    London, 2017-02-20

  • Register

    Earthquake America

    London, 2017-01-18

See more events

Top cartoons

  • Collins_trident_final
  • collinshebdo
  • USEDcartoon_richer
  • 225_cartoon6
  • 217_cartoon_7
  • 217_cartoon_4
  • 217_cartoon_6
  • 217_cartoon_10
  • 217_cartoon_8
  • Collins_trident_final
  • collinshebdo
  • USEDcartoon_richer
  • 225_cartoon6
  • 217_cartoon_7
  • 217_cartoon_4
  • 217_cartoon_6
  • 217_cartoon_10
  • 217_cartoon_8

Sponsored features

  • Mind the gap: cutting poverty among disabled people

  • Manufacturing: how much of it depends on the single market?

  • Wine: What is minerality?

  • Providing the means for regions to trade internationally

  • Data as infrastructure: driving growth in devolved regions

Our Top Writers

  • Sam Tanenhaus

    Sam Tanenhaus is Prospect's US Writer-at-Large

  • George Magnus

    George Magnus is a well known economist, former Chief Economist at UBS and author of "Uprising: Will Emerging Markets Shape or Shake the World Economy?" (John Wiley)

  • John Kay

    John Kay is an economist and author. His most recent book "Other People's Money" is published by Profile

  • Philip Collins

    Philip Collins is an associate editor of Prospect

  • Diane Roberts

    Diane Roberts is an American author, columnist, essayist, radio commentator, reviewer and professor of English at Florida State University.

  • John Harris

    John Harris is a journalist and broadcaster

  • Frances Cairncross

    Frances Cairncross is Chair of Court of Heriot-Watt University and Honorary Fellow of Exeter

See more writers
PrimeTime

Prospect has established itself as a must-read title with key figures in government, journalism, policy making and business. People turn to Prospect for the ideas and trends behind the headlines and for a contrarian view of topics.

Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • RSS

Editorial

Editor: Tom Clark
Deputy Editor: Jay Elwes
Arts and Books Editor: Sameer Rahim
Assistant Editor: Ian Irvine
Assistant Digital Editor: Alex Dean
Design: Mike Turner
Production Editor: Chris Tilbury
US Writer-at-Large: Sam Tanenhaus

Commercial

Commercial Director: Alex Stevenson
Finance Manager: Pauline Joy
Head of Marketing: Paul Mortimer
Marketing & Circulation Executive: James Hawkins
Head of Engagement: David Tripepi-Lewis
Head of Events: Charlotte Stone
Events Assistant: Keith Leon
Editorial roundtables: Penny Cranford
Head of Advertising Sales: Adam Kinlan 020 3372 2934
Senior Account Manager: Johnnie Norton 020 3372 2931

  • Home
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
© Prosp Publishing Limited
×
Login
Login with your subscriber account:
You need a valid subscription to login.
I am
Remember Me


Forgotten password?

Or enter with social networking:
Login to post comments using social media accounts.
  • With Twitter
  • Connect
  • With Google +
×
Register Now

Register today and find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox.
PLUS we’ll send you Prospect’s e-book—The past in perspective and you’ll be able to access any 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website over the next 30 days!

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party.
You can unsubscribe from the Prospect e-mail newsletter at any time.

×
You’ve got full access!

It looks like you are a Prospect subscriber.

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.